24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4226)
>虫友互识 (436)
>文献求助 (400)
>导师招生 (389)
>论文投稿 (135)
>硕博家园 (128)
>考博 (113)
>休闲灌水 (110)
>博后之家 (100)
>招聘信息布告栏 (98)
>催化 (59)
>公派出国 (56)
>基金申请 (51)
>考研 (51)
>论文道贺祈福 (46)
>教师之家 (45)

返回列表

paul_lbw

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 24.5
帖子: 1
在线: 1.6小时
虫号: 1551518
注册: 2011-12-26
专业: 医用生物材料与植入科学

[求助] JBMR-a 投稿第二次大修修稿意见是什么意思呀？

Comments from the editor:  Major review suggests the material should be edited and reduced to a Technical note, 10 pp. total including references, with a maximum of 4 figures and/or tables.

Reviewer: 1) There is no permeability data, which is ultimately the most important feature.  It is notoriously difficult to do comparative capillary counts because capillaries typically collapse in tissue preparation.  2) Most readers would consider this to be short- or intermediate-term (100 days) compared to published results of >500 days with simple membranes.  3) Much of the text is based on speculation perpetuated from other authors, not published in peer-reviewed journals. 4) Aside from the Nafion-only result, there is really very little difference between membranes.  It would be much stronger if the text were cut way down and the data reported as a note.

第一次修稿意见有3页多，修完后稿件长度是23页(正文含参考文献)，这次修稿意见只有大半页，算松半口气...    这次主编是要求将稿件正文压缩至10页（含参考文献）？并且将其中的技术性内容以“Technical note” 的附件给出？ ”Technical note“ 不是很理解，希望各位朋友能给点意见呀，该怎么写？
审稿人的第1条意见，我自己的实验就是缺乏这样的直观数据，但是很多文献也是这么分析的，审稿人提出这样的问题该怎么答复审稿人好呢？  第3条意见读不懂呀！  第4条意见说的  reported as a note 是指怎么修改呀？不知道什么意思。。。

各位虫虫，我第一次投SCI，没什么经验，金币不多，只能给两位答复者5个金币，多多感谢各位！以后多逛你们的帖子！

不胜感谢！

回复此楼