| 查看: 907 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
汉译英，翻译求助。
|
||
|
汉译英，求润色！ 基体的阻尼振幅效应不明显,阻尼值在1.3左右改变,因此,涂层结构的复杂的阻尼振幅效应应该与基体无关,主要是由涂层引起的。为了便于比较，本文将涂层结构的阻尼值减去基体的阻尼值近似得到涂层的阻尼值.EB-PVD涂层的阻尼振幅效应不太明显,随着应变的增加,其阻尼值基本不变。 The damping amplitude effect of the substrate was not obvious, and the damping changed almost nothing , its valve was about 1.3. Therefore, the complex damping amplitude effect should be nothing to do with the substrate and be mainly caused by the coating. For a purposes of comparison, the damping value of coating system minus the one of the matrix was approximated by the damping value of the coating. EB-PVD coating amplitude damping effect is less obvious and the damping value. is essentially equal as the strain increasing. 从公式1可以看出，样品1的界面处的单位厚度上的缺陷率最高，基于能量耗散基础，最终使得样品1的系统阻尼值最高。 As can be seen from Equation 1 , the defect rate of the unit thickness at the interface for the sample 1 was highest, based on the energy dissipation, and ultimately makeed the the system damping of the sample 1 enhace. APS 和 EB-PVD 涂层系统的阻尼有很大的不同，这应该是由于APS 和 EB-PVD 涂层的微观结构引起的，与基体无关。通过对单独的APS 和 EB-PVD 涂层进行分析，可以发现，当应变高于2.0时，APS 涂层的阻尼值有一个很大的增加，而EB-PVD 涂层的阻尼振幅效应却不太明显，这应该主要是由于两种涂层的不同的能量耗散机制引起的。 The damping of the APS and EB-PVD coating system had a significant difference which could be explained by analyzing their two very different microstructures, with nothing to do the substrate. single APS and EB-PVD coating can be found, when the strain is higher than 2.0 , the damping value of the APS coating has a dramatic increase, while the the amplitude damping effect of the EB-PVD coating is less obviously, which should be mainly caused by the different energy dissipation mechanism of the two coatings . [ Last edited by wxqtjw on 2013-4-13 at 13:19 ] |
回复此楼
phu_grassman
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
快乐岛、布吉岛岛主
- 翻译EPI: 265
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.392
- 金币: 7538.7
- 散金: 11599
- 红花: 107
- 沙发: 11
- 帖子: 5611
- 在线: 1480.2小时
- 虫号: 1151372
- 注册: 2010-11-20
- 专业: 电化学
- 管辖: English Cafe
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★
爱与雨下: 金币+2 2013-04-13 21:25:26
爱与雨下: 金币+2 2013-04-13 21:25:26
|
基体的阻尼振幅效应不明显,阻尼值在1.3左右改变,因此,涂层结构的复杂的阻尼振幅效应应该与基体无关,主要是由涂层引起的。为了便于比较，本文将涂层结构的阻尼值减去基体的阻尼值近似得到涂层的阻尼值.EB-PVD涂层的阻尼振幅效应不太明显,随着应变的增加,其阻尼值基本不变。 No obvious damping amplitude effect was observed for the substrate, whose damping value changed slightly near 1.3. Therefore, what accounts for the complex damping amplitude effect should be the coating but the substrate. For comparison in this paper, the approximate damping value of the coating was obtained by subtracting the damping value of the coating from that of the substrate. The amplitude damping effect of the EB-PVD coating is not so evident that the damping value changes little with the strain increasing. 从公式1可以看出，样品1的界面处的单位厚度上的缺陷率最高，基于能量耗散基础，最终使得样品1的系统阻尼值最高。 As can be seen from Equation 1 , Sample 1 has the highest defect rate per unit thickness at the interface and ultimately the highest system damping based on energy dissipation. APS 和 EB-PVD 涂层系统的阻尼有很大的不同，这应该是由于APS 和 EB-PVD 涂层的微观结构引起的，与基体无关。通过对单独的APS 和 EB-PVD 涂层进行分析，可以发现，当应变高于2.0时，APS 涂层的阻尼值有一个很大的增加，而EB-PVD 涂层的阻尼振幅效应却不太明显，这应该主要是由于两种涂层的不同的能量耗散机制引起的。 The damping of the APS and EB-PVD systems displays distinct difference, which could result from the different microstructures of the two coating materials and have nothing to do with the substrate. By analyzing single APS and EB-PVD coating, it can be found that there is a dramatic increase in the damping value of the APS coating when the strain is higher than 2.0, while the amplitude damping effect of the EB-PVD coating is not so obvious, which could mainly be caused by the different energy dissipation mechanisms of the two coatings . |
2楼2013-04-13 15:03:23
|
我这里还有一段话，汉译英，你能再帮我润色一下吗？（只剩下5个金币了，润色完后一并都给你了，非常感谢你） 本文中，由于样品2的热处理时间要高于样品3的热处理时间，因此使得样品2的弹性模量要高于样品3的弹性模量。在室温下，一般认为弹性模量与储能模量是基本相等的。本文假设界面对涂层系统的模量的贡献小于涂层对涂层系统模量的贡献，因此本文认为室温下样品2的储能模量要高于样品3的储能模量。在高温下，如何解释样品2的储能模量要高于样品3的储能模量，有待进一步研究。 In this paper, the heat treatment time of the sample 2 is higher than that of the sample 3, so the elastic modulus of sample 2 is higher than that of the sample 3. At room temperature, it is generally believed that the elastic modulus and the storage modulus is substantially equal. This paper assumes that the interface makes a less contribution to the elastic modulus of the coating system than the coating. So that at the room temperature, storage modulus of the sample 2 is higher than that of the sample 3. At high temperatures, it needs to be further discussed that why the storage elastic modulus of sample 2 is higher than that of the sample 3. |
3楼2013-04-13 21:19:24
phu_grassman
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
快乐岛、布吉岛岛主
- 翻译EPI: 265
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.392
- 金币: 7538.7
- 散金: 11599
- 红花: 107
- 沙发: 11
- 帖子: 5611
- 在线: 1480.2小时
- 虫号: 1151372
- 注册: 2010-11-20
- 专业: 电化学
- 管辖: English Cafe
4楼2013-04-13 22:09:13
phu_grassman
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
快乐岛、布吉岛岛主
- 翻译EPI: 265
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.392
- 金币: 7538.7
- 散金: 11599
- 红花: 107
- 沙发: 11
- 帖子: 5611
- 在线: 1480.2小时
- 虫号: 1151372
- 注册: 2010-11-20
- 专业: 电化学
- 管辖: English Cafe
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
wxqtjw: 金币+43, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2013-04-13 22:52:18
wxqtjw: 金币+43, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2013-04-13 22:52:18
| Sample 2 undergoes longer heating treatment that Sample 3 in the experiment, so the elastic modulus of Sample 2 is higher than that of Sample 3. It is generally believed that the elastic modulus and the storage modulus are substantially equal at room temperature. It’s assumed in this paper that the interface makes less contributions to the elastic modulus of the coating system than the coating. So the storage modulus of Sample 2 is higher than that of Sample 3 at room temperature. Nevertheless, it needs to be further discussed why the storage elastic modulus of Sample 2 is higher than that of Sample 3. |
5楼2013-04-13 22:35:56
10