24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3120  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

cumtphdsunny

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] l两个大修,编辑拒稿,是否可重投该杂志?

本人去年投了一篇sci,两个审稿人给了大修,其中一个审稿人是同行,提了22个问题,引言要重写,增加几篇参考文献,不过都很中肯;第二个审稿人提了5个问题,说实验结果没有认真深入分析和讨论,副编辑委婉拒稿。请大家分析一下是否可以按照两个审稿专家意见修改后重投该杂志。
以下是副编辑给的拒稿信
Dear Prof. Dr....:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels.  It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed.  The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision.  In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels.  I think it would be better suited to publication in a more petrologically related journal

With sincere regards,

Richard G. Mallinson
Associate Editor
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lushaowu2009

铁虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
cumtphdsunny: 金币+5 2013-03-21 17:20:25
cumtphdsunny: 金币+2 2013-03-25 10:29:38
编辑不认可,重投估计没戏,修改后还是改投吧~
2楼2013-03-21 16:54:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 cumtphdsunny 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见