| 查看: 2229 | 回复: 10 | |||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||
zhouone1111金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
colloid and polymer science 修改意见
|
||||
|
问问各位大侠编辑是什么意思 Manuscript ID CPS-2013-0030 entitled "Preparation and characterization of the microencapsulated phase change materials by using nonionic emulsifiers" which you submitted to the Colloid and Polymer Science, has been reviewed. The comments from reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s), I must decline the manuscript for publication in the Colloid and Polymer Science at this time. However, a new manuscript may be submitted which takes into consideration these comments. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered. You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. Once you have revised your manuscript, go to https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cps and login to your Author Center. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the Colloid and Polymer Science, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission. I look forward to a resubmission. Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author This manuscript deals with the fabrications and characterizations of microcapsules containing phase change materials. They employed a series of well-known non-ionic surfactant to fabricate stable microcapsules. This manuscript addresses a stream of conventional research, but it potentially has meanings for development of methodology. First, this manuscript is easy to follow and the explanations are quite clear. However, it is very difficult to witness the originality or novelty of this manuscript at a glance. Here are some comments from my viewpoint. 1. I cautiously suggest that English needs much work in spellings, grammar, and expressions. 2. The abstract is not really clear. It must be more concise and succinct. 3. Introduction part is quite boring. It should be also more compact and can be shortened significantly. Most of all, the highlights of this study were not conspicuously stated in this paragraph. 4. Page 2 : What is SMA? 5. Page 2 : The important of PCM has relations with this study? 6. The combinations of TWEEN and SPAN have been employed for more than decades. Are these ideas new? 7. The authors have missed several important precedented works using tween and span cosurfactant systems for microcapsule fabrications. 8. Experimental : please provide locations for chemical vendors. 9. Please provide stoichiometry informations for every fabrication procedures. 10. R & D : A lot of things might happen in co-surfactant or co-emulsifier systems. So it is critical to state clearly all the possible phenomena which can occur implicitly or explicitly during each step. I believe this is the core value of this work. This content should be included in section 3.1. However, this manuscript has left out all the important explanations for possible mechanism or dynamics of co-surfactant system under given conditions. The uses of primitive terminologies in this paragraph also make this manuscript loose. 11. Most of the sentences in R and D section are ambiguous and unclear. Please make it fathomable even to readers of general interests. 12. Page 8 Line 7 The so called HLB balance influences the rate of polymerizations? It is true? 13. What is the relation between viscosity of the emulsion and particle size? Please specify. 14. Page 8 line 6 from bottom. “The stability of compound emulsifier is better than single surfactant.” I cautiously think that this is nonsensical reasoning. Based on these comments, I do not recommend the publication of this manuscript at this condition. I might reconsider this manuscript only after major alterations. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author In this work, the authors described the result that not only exterior (morphology) but also interior structures (properties of the core and shell) of microencapsulated phage change materials were able to be regulated by using nonionic emulsifiers. Their data of several analyses seemed to be supportive to their findings. I consider their study would be publishable in the journal Colloid and Polymer Science and it could probably attract attention of the audience. I also consider that there are some problems that should be revised before publication though their work would be interesting. I have written some comments including insignificant points in the following. (1) I cannot find the weight ratio of the compound nonionic emulsifier (the mixture of Tween80 and Span80). The authors described the grams of some compound nonionic emulsifiers in Fig. 3.2 and Table 3.1; however, I cannot know whether such values mean the gram of the whole mixture or that of each emulsifier. (2) In the caption of Fig.3.1 (a), the emulsifier used was designated as op-10, while in the text, the emulsifier used in Fig.3.1 (a) was designated as tween60 (page 9). (3) The molecular formula “CnH2n+2” (page 5) was not correct. Instead, the formula must be expressed by “CnH2n-2”. (4) In the Materials subsection (page 5), the first letter of each emulsifier is capital, but in the other sections, the letter is lower case. (5) It is better to mention the type of the spectrophotometer (page 8) more clearly (now, “721-UV, china”). (6) The authors had better carefully verify their English. There are some mistakes found: e.g., “For instance, Solid-liquid…(page 2)” ; “…can be overcame…(page 3)”; “… of Microcapsules. (page 6)”; “tab 3.1. (page 6)”; “compacter (page. 14, probably “more compact” is preferable) ”; “Transmitance (Fig. 3.6)”; “…leak in acetone (page 18, “leaked” or “leaks”)”. (7) Please give a glance at the recent paper published in Colloid and Polymer Science. Usually, authors does not number any section. So, figures are to be numbered simply in the order; e.g., Fig. 1; Fig. 2…. In this manuscript, figures (and tables) were numbers as Fig. 3.1, Fig. 3.2, … |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
本人考085602 化学工程 专硕
已经有23人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
求调剂院校信息
已经有4人回复
-
085600材料与化工306
已经有4人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
328求调剂，英语六级551，有科研经历
已经有9人回复
-
一志愿北京化工大学070300 学硕336求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
286分人工智能专业请求调剂愿意跨考！
已经有8人回复
-
资源与环境 调剂申请(333分)
已经有5人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- journal of applied polymer science 投修改稿问题
已经有6人回复
- Colloid and Polymer Science投稿时只需要一个文件吗？
已经有7人回复
- 投稿 polymer engineering and science
已经有15人回复
- colloid and polymer science 是不是 需要先注册才能看到投稿须知呢？
已经有5人回复
- 学高分子的经典书籍——polymer science and Materials Case Study
已经有258人回复
- COLLOID AND POLYMER SCIENCE 投稿10天了没啥动静
已经有98人回复
- colloid and polymer science注册投稿
已经有3人回复
- 修改稿提交2周了 ADM还是not assigned
已经有5人回复
- 投Journal of applied polymer science被拒了改完还能重投这个杂志吗
已经有7人回复
- 聚合物包覆磁性微球方向哪个杂志（SCI）好中？
已经有6人回复
- Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
已经有6人回复
- 【求助】各位虫友，发涂料方面的文章，除了《涂料工业》之外，还有那些好点的杂志啊，
已经有9人回复
- Colloid and Polymer Science 投稿
已经有8人回复
- polymer engineering and science 大修后祈福
已经有19人回复
- 各位虫友，有投稿这个期刊的吗 《colloid and polymer science 》
已经有4人回复
- Colloid and Polymer Science 投稿状态请教
已经有9人回复
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhouone1111: 金币+3, ★有帮助 2013-03-14 23:11:09
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhouone1111: 金币+3, ★有帮助 2013-03-14 23:11:09
|
Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the Colloid and Polymer Science, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission. 因为我们尽力为投到本期刊的文章及时发表提供便利，所以你的修改稿必须尽快上传。如果你不能在一段合理时间内上传修改稿，我们将会把你的文章作为新稿件处理。 I look forward to a resubmission. 我期待一个重投的稿件。 |
3楼2013-03-14 21:12:26
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
2楼2013-03-14 20:01:46
glassman782
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1519 (讲师)
- 金币: 13340.3
- 红花: 29
- 帖子: 7313
- 在线: 513.9小时
- 虫号: 468843
- 注册: 2007-11-28
- 专业: 粉末冶金与粉体工程
4楼2013-03-14 21:17:11
zhouone1111
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 535.9
- 散金: 502
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 150
- 在线: 299.1小时
- 虫号: 1685847
- 注册: 2012-03-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子合成化学
5楼2013-03-14 23:12:44
