24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3379  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wmjjmw01

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] accept with major revision 但意见不多

Dear Dr Peng,

I regret to inform you that your work can be reconsidered for publication only with extensive revisions to your manuscript. The reviewers' advice on the necessary revisions and their comments are appended below.

If you are willing to undertake the required amendments, please submit a point by point response listing your changes or justifications to the reviewers' comments when you submit the revised manuscript.

With warm regards,

Toshio Kitamura


Reviewers' comments:

A Editorial Board

This study, which is carefully performed, is an interesting one. Both reviewers recognized some merit in this paper.  Please carefully respond all concerns raised by the reviewers.

I have one minor concern
Regarding statistic p values, the authors should described them as more accurate number (for example <0.001) instead of 0.00.


Reviewer #1: This paper describes the long-term effects of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) for patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).  They also tried to determine the predictive factors for promising hematological outcomes.  
Along with the advancement in some new drugs including rituximab and thrombopoietin receptor agonists, it is important to re-examine and analyze the long-term effects of LS and the predictive factors for good outcomes.

Major issues
1. They retrospectively analyzed the data in 92 patients who underwent LS for chronic ITP.  Their remission rate (76.1%) is relatively favorable and indicated that LS is still one of the treatment options for chronic ITP even in an era of new drugs.

2. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, they showed that only the platelet counts on postoperative months 3 (POM3) was a significant independent prognostic factor for long-time response to LS.  This information is also useful to estimate the long-time response for each patient.  

3. The authors previously reported about LS for ITP patients (ref 11, Int J Hematol 94:533-538) .  In this paper, they analysed 10 ITP patients who underwent LS because of severe thrombocytopenia, from April 2006 to Jan 2011.  They have to make clear whether these 10 patients were overlapped with 92 (from Nov 2006 to Aug 2012) patients in the current report or not.


4. They mentioned that one patient has died of severe pulmonary infection after LS on POD 5.  I want to know whether this patient was suffered by overwhelming postsplenectomy infection (OPSI).  It is also interesting to know whether these patients were given pneumococcal vaccine around LS in their institute.


Minor issues
1. In Table 2, they use abbreviated words "RG" and "NG".  They should indicate what these abbreviations stand for.



Reviewer #2: The authors described the clinical research entitled predictive factors associated with long-term effects of laparoscopic splenectomy for chronic immune thrombocytopenia. In this paper, they clearly demonstrated that platelet count on POM3 was significant independent predictor of long-term favorable outcome. Their conclusions are almost acceptable, however, several questions are raised up as below.

1) Several investigators already reported that young patients showed higher CR responses of splenectomy than those in elderly patients. However, CR rate in this paper was thought to be lower (53.3 %) than expected.

2) It was reported that the good response to IVIG might be available for predictor of successful splenectomy. Did you check this phenomenon in your study?

3) The importance of platelet raise after splenectomy was already well known in hematologists. Some papers reported POM 1 was available as predictable indicator.However, you mentioned the POM3 was significant, not POM 1. You should explain the reason on




求助。有戏没???彻夜难眠55555555555
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

啸天犬

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
认真修改吧,好好修改就会接收。
天下兴亡,我的责任!
11楼2013-03-14 17:27:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

fsmyn

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
认真修改,录用可能很大。好运!!
静以修身
2楼2013-03-14 10:51:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wmjjmw01

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by fsmyn at 2013-03-14 10:51:37
认真修改,录用可能很大。好运!!

谢谢。 一晚没睡好觉
3楼2013-03-14 10:53:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

janesonimr

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
好好按照审稿人的意见修改吧,机会很大
4楼2013-03-14 10:54:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +17 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 19/950 2026-08-31 21:30 by xiangy672
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +6 gdd2018 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 08:58 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +15 晴天加油 2026-08-26 16/800 2026-08-29 18:28 by symmetry
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 (EPI+1)(金币+50) +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
信息提示
请填处理意见