24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
查看: 501  |  回复: 1

myIDname

木虫 (著名写手)

人民大会堂首席清洁工

[交流] 2013/3/8 NOW@SCIENCE之一:WHO:福岛核泄漏几乎未增加患癌几率 已有1人参与

Science的news of week本周第一条,原文链接:http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6124/1130.1.full.pdf


Okuma, Japan 1
WHO: Fukushima Caused Minimal Cancer Risk
WHO:福岛核泄漏几乎未增加患癌几率

The World Health Organization (WHO) on 28 February released a report saying that the Fukushima nuclear disaster will cause no observable increases in cancer rates among residents of other countries and a very minimal increased risk of cancer among residents in the vicinity of the power plant. Workers who battled problems at the plant do face higher risks for some cancers. The WHO team estimated the increased lifetime risk of leukemia, thyroid cancer, and female breast cancer based on earlier estimates of radiation exposure in different locations around the power plant, which experienced multiple meltdowns and explosions in the aftermath of the 11 March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.

世界卫生组织(WHO)上月28号发布的一份报告中声称,福岛核泄露事故不会导致其它国家居民癌症患病几率明显的上升,而且核电站周边居民的癌症患病几率也几乎没有增加。然而当时处理泄漏事故的核电站工人患有某些癌症的几率会相对较高。WHO根据初步辐射暴露数据进行预估,发现一生当中患白血病,甲状腺癌和乳腺癌的几率会增加。这些初步数据来自核电站周围几个在2011年3月11日地震和海啸的余波中经历了多次核熔毁和泄露事故的地方。


Greenpeace condemned the report, stating that it “shamelessly downplays the impact of early radioactive releases from the Fukushima disaster on people inside the 20 km evacuation zone who were not able to leave the area quickly.” But Kazuo Sakai, a radiation biologist at Japan’s National Institute of Radiological Sciences, believes that the risks are overestimated, noting that the dose estimates used were based on preliminary data; actual measurements have shown the dose levels to be lower.

绿色和平组织谴责了这份报告,认为它“恬不知耻地把当时20公里疏散区内未能迅速撤离的居民受到的核辐射影响轻描淡写”。然而,日本国立辐射研究所的辐射生物学家Kazuo Sakai却认为是风险是被放大了。他指出,报告中使用的辐射剂量是之前的初步数据;实际测量的结果其实更低。

***************************************************************
Science的原文和本翻译仅用于网友交流学习之用,若您有其它用途,比如商业用途等,请联系Science杂志社了解原文使用权等相关事宜。谢谢!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

我们这里有勇敢的人民/荜路蓝缕以启山林/我们这里有无穷的生命/水牛稻米香蕉玉兰花
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

s0s2005

木虫 (著名写手)


题目好像就有误导。
怎么会是没有增加呢?
题目明确说明:
1,核泄漏有危害。
2,已经造成了危害。
3,危害程度是Minimal,你觉得少,那得看基数是多少。
理解了,一切都可以原谅;原谅了,一切都可以理解。有聆听的耳朵就会有原谅的心。
2楼2013-07-03 00:05:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 myIDname 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 一志愿哈工大 085600 277 12材科基求调剂 5+5 chenny174 2026-04-10 24/1200 2026-04-12 02:39 by 秋豆菜芽
[考研] 211本科材料化工求调剂 +13 YHLAH 2026-04-11 14/700 2026-04-11 23:13 by 幸免 ..
[考研] 296求调剂 +8 汪!?! 2026-04-09 8/400 2026-04-11 21:02 by 逆水乘风
[考研] 11408。358求调剂 +3 TMYzds 2026-04-07 3/150 2026-04-11 17:10 by 氮气气气
[考研] 352 求调剂 +6 yzion 2026-04-11 8/400 2026-04-11 16:24 by 明月此时有
[考研] 085600材料与化工329分求调剂 +16 叶zilin 2026-04-10 16/800 2026-04-11 11:04 by may_新宇
[考研] 297求调剂 +9 Kwgyz 2026-04-09 9/450 2026-04-11 10:09 by zhq0425
[考研] 化学工程与技术324调剂 +23 孙常华 2026-04-09 25/1250 2026-04-11 00:07 by 骑牛渡寒江
[考研] 284求调剂 +9 让我上岸吧阿西 2026-04-09 11/550 2026-04-10 19:18 by 靖jing
[考研] 362求调剂 +10 我要考大 2026-04-06 14/700 2026-04-10 17:00 by luoyongfeng
[考研] 一志愿 江南大学 085602 化工专硕 338分求调剂 +16 路痴小琪 2026-04-05 16/800 2026-04-10 08:08 by kangsm
[考研] 已调剂 +18 柴郡猫_ 2026-04-09 19/950 2026-04-09 22:10 by 柴郡猫_
[考研] 288求调剂 +15 没有答案_ 2026-04-05 15/750 2026-04-09 10:22 by 5268321
[考研] 一志愿鲁东大学071000生物学学硕初试分数276求调剂 +3 慕绝cc 2026-04-09 3/150 2026-04-09 09:57 by liuhuiying09
[考研] 材料专硕(0856) 339分求调剂 +16 哈哈哈鹅哈哈哈 2026-04-05 16/800 2026-04-08 16:02 by luoyongfeng
[考研] 323求调剂 +3 林zlu 2026-04-07 4/200 2026-04-07 23:21 by lbsjt
[考研] 生物学学硕求调剂:351分一志愿南京师范大学生物学专业 +6 …~、王…~ 2026-04-06 7/350 2026-04-06 18:54 by macy2011
[考研] 285求调剂 +5 mapmath 2026-04-06 6/300 2026-04-06 17:18 by 蓝云思雨
[考研] 085405软件工程301分求调剂,专硕可跨专业,四六级已过 +3 静静想想 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-06 15:23 by nepu_uu
[考研] 0857大类环境工程B区求调剂 +3 龚禹铭 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-06 10:22 by 蓝云思雨
信息提示
请填处理意见