24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 481  |  回复: 1

myIDname

木虫 (著名写手)

人民大会堂首席清洁工

[交流] 2013/3/8 NOW@SCIENCE之一:WHO:福岛核泄漏几乎未增加患癌几率 已有1人参与

Science的news of week本周第一条,原文链接:http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6124/1130.1.full.pdf


Okuma, Japan 1
WHO: Fukushima Caused Minimal Cancer Risk
WHO:福岛核泄漏几乎未增加患癌几率

The World Health Organization (WHO) on 28 February released a report saying that the Fukushima nuclear disaster will cause no observable increases in cancer rates among residents of other countries and a very minimal increased risk of cancer among residents in the vicinity of the power plant. Workers who battled problems at the plant do face higher risks for some cancers. The WHO team estimated the increased lifetime risk of leukemia, thyroid cancer, and female breast cancer based on earlier estimates of radiation exposure in different locations around the power plant, which experienced multiple meltdowns and explosions in the aftermath of the 11 March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.

世界卫生组织(WHO)上月28号发布的一份报告中声称,福岛核泄露事故不会导致其它国家居民癌症患病几率明显的上升,而且核电站周边居民的癌症患病几率也几乎没有增加。然而当时处理泄漏事故的核电站工人患有某些癌症的几率会相对较高。WHO根据初步辐射暴露数据进行预估,发现一生当中患白血病,甲状腺癌和乳腺癌的几率会增加。这些初步数据来自核电站周围几个在2011年3月11日地震和海啸的余波中经历了多次核熔毁和泄露事故的地方。


Greenpeace condemned the report, stating that it “shamelessly downplays the impact of early radioactive releases from the Fukushima disaster on people inside the 20 km evacuation zone who were not able to leave the area quickly.” But Kazuo Sakai, a radiation biologist at Japan’s National Institute of Radiological Sciences, believes that the risks are overestimated, noting that the dose estimates used were based on preliminary data; actual measurements have shown the dose levels to be lower.

绿色和平组织谴责了这份报告,认为它“恬不知耻地把当时20公里疏散区内未能迅速撤离的居民受到的核辐射影响轻描淡写”。然而,日本国立辐射研究所的辐射生物学家Kazuo Sakai却认为是风险是被放大了。他指出,报告中使用的辐射剂量是之前的初步数据;实际测量的结果其实更低。

***************************************************************
Science的原文和本翻译仅用于网友交流学习之用,若您有其它用途,比如商业用途等,请联系Science杂志社了解原文使用权等相关事宜。谢谢!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

我们这里有勇敢的人民/荜路蓝缕以启山林/我们这里有无穷的生命/水牛稻米香蕉玉兰花
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

s0s2005

木虫 (著名写手)


题目好像就有误导。
怎么会是没有增加呢?
题目明确说明:
1,核泄漏有危害。
2,已经造成了危害。
3,危害程度是Minimal,你觉得少,那得看基数是多少。
理解了,一切都可以原谅;原谅了,一切都可以理解。有聆听的耳朵就会有原谅的心。
2楼2013-07-03 00:05:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 myIDname 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见