24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

manmanwudi

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 103.1
帖子: 57
在线: 21.9小时
虫号: 2085546

[交流] Here to play a game, help in urgent need!!!!

I have been busying doing litereture review on impact of  pesticides on human health. EPA  has evaluated some chemicals on their human carcinogen. I am puzzled about the possibility of human carcinogen of different results
1 Possible Human Carcinogen
2 Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans at High Doses Not Likely to be    Carcinogenic to Humans at Low Doses
3 Suggestive Evidence Of Carcinogenic Potential
4 Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans
5 Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenicity, but Not Sufficient to Assess Human Carcinogenic Potential
6 Probable Human Carcinogen
7 Known/Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans
what is your opinion? could you sort the results according to the possibility of  human carcinogen ? Thank you

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

资源列表

» 猜你喜欢

自荐读博已经有8人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球已经有8人回复
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动已经有4人回复
求个博导看看已经有18人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2013-03-06 16:57:49

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

00waterh

木虫 (知名作家)

★ ★ ★
manmanwudi(金币+1): 谢谢参与
winter_north: 金币+2, At least harmful, if it is not carcinogenic. 2013-03-07 06:05:50

i think pestcides likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans at High Doses Not Likely to be carcinogenic to Humans at Low Doses.i couldnot sort the results according to that，because 1 and 6，4and7 are so hard for me to distinguish……

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]

赞一下