24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 708  |  回复: 3

wangshingo

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 请问这样回复SCI审稿人意见切题吗?帮我看下英语表述吧,谢谢

1) Response to comment: The dimensions in Fig.4 are given as 15 and 25. However these dimensions should be given as 10D and 25D. Because in the manuscript the are described as 10 diameters upwind, 15 diameters downwind and 7.5 diameters away from the blade (Page 6, Line 10).

Response: It is really true as the reviewer suggested that the dimensions in Fig.4 should be given as 15D and 25D. Thus, we have made corrections according to the reviewer’s good instructions.
Meanwhile, (Page 6, Line 10-13) the statements of “10 diameters upwind and 15 diameters downwind of the rotor and 7.5 diameters away from the rotor” were corrected as “10 diameters (D) upwind and 15D downwind of the rotor and 7.5D away from the rotor”.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

snack

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
专业不同,不好具体作评价。从字面意思上看应该是直接回答问题了,建议LZ将corrected改成revised,corrections改成the corresponding revisions. 用correct感觉是自己承认以前是‘错’的。
2楼2013-03-05 08:35:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
wangshingo: 金币+5 2013-03-09 08:40:05
写得太罗嗦了。直接写:Thanks for the suggestion. We changed ... to ... in the revision.
3楼2013-03-05 08:59:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ll9999

专家顾问 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
楼上说的好,不要画蛇添脚为宜。
4楼2013-03-05 10:11:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wangshingo 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见