| 查看: 2322 | 回复: 15 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
wangshingo木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
请问回复审稿人意见。这样回复可以吗?请大家帮我看看
|
|
|
1) Response to comment: In the abstract, it is mentioned that simulations and experiments have been made to optimize the shape of guide blades. However, there is no results given about these simulations and experiments in the manuscript. The optimization of guide blades is mentioned as future study at the end of conclusions. Response: We are sorry for this mistake. The present research does not include the impact of the guide blades on the performance of the micro-wind turbine in the manuscript。 According to the Reviewer’s comment we have made correction. In the abstract, (Page 1, Line 42) “Further simulations and experiments ................the device” was deleted. (Page 1, Line 25) “In the present paper, researches neglected the impact of the guide blades on the performance of the .........” was added. |
» 猜你喜欢
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么?
已经有7人回复
J-J-W不为人知的一面
已经有19人回复
没消息就是被刷了呗
已经有14人回复
微信指数没变化,科研之友没阅读
已经有8人回复
时间戳他又来了
已经有12人回复
这种情况还有戏吗
已经有11人回复
同事接到电话了,我却没有
已经有4人回复
准备明年的基金了
已经有5人回复
今年的WR进展到哪一步了?
已经有6人回复
小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了
已经有15人回复
16楼2013-03-06 09:46:33
2楼2013-03-04 18:46:54
wangshingo
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7750.6
- 散金: 786
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1577
- 在线: 250.6小时
- 虫号: 412998
- 注册: 2007-06-26
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 可再生与替代能源利用中的
3楼2013-03-04 18:48:12
huanghuasjtu
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 241 (大学生)
- 金币: 20641.8
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 3001
- 在线: 576.5小时
- 虫号: 2123410
- 注册: 2012-11-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属非晶态、准晶和纳米晶

4楼2013-03-04 18:51:12











回复此楼