| 查看: 2021 | 回复: 15 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
wangshingo木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
请问回复审稿人意见。这样回复可以吗？请大家帮我看看
|
|
|
1) Response to comment: In the abstract, it is mentioned that simulations and experiments have been made to optimize the shape of guide blades. However, there is no results given about these simulations and experiments in the manuscript. The optimization of guide blades is mentioned as future study at the end of conclusions. Response: We are sorry for this mistake. The present research does not include the impact of the guide blades on the performance of the micro-wind turbine in the manuscript。 According to the Reviewer’s comment we have made correction. In the abstract, (Page 1, Line 42) “Further simulations and experiments ................the device” was deleted. (Page 1, Line 25) “In the present paper, researches neglected the impact of the guide blades on the performance of the .........” was added. |
回复此楼
licong9527
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
专家顾问
- 应助: 96 (初中生)
- 贵宾: 0.799
- 金币: 10870.6
- 散金: 10586
- 红花: 51
- 沙发: 28
- 帖子: 13537
- 在线: 891.6小时
- 虫号: 2173918
- 注册: 2012-12-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 美术
12楼2013-03-04 21:57:42
2楼2013-03-04 18:46:54
wangshingo
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7750.6
- 散金: 786
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1577
- 在线: 250.6小时
- 虫号: 412998
- 注册: 2007-06-26
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 可再生与替代能源利用中的
3楼2013-03-04 18:48:12
huanghuasjtu
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 241 (大学生)
- 金币: 20311.8
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 2949
- 在线: 576小时
- 虫号: 2123410
- 注册: 2012-11-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属非晶态、准晶和纳米晶
4楼2013-03-04 18:51:12
