24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

迈步从头越

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 10 (幼儿园)
金币: 4286.1
帖子: 1323
在线: 846小时
虫号: 675632

[交流] 投了一篇ACS Catal，审稿意见如下，修改后重投有希望吗

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in ACS Catalysis. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in ACS Catalysis.
However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that included such data and analysis, assuming no related data is published in the interim. We ask that you submit your revision by 01-Jun. This revision should address the reviewers’ comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns. Please either highlight, color font, or underline the actual changes made to the manuscript.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

RSC和ACS的审稿意见结果什么的是共享的吗？？被拒后重投有什么经验？？已经有10人回复
【求助】有劳虫友高手帮忙看看acs审稿意见，多谢！已经有5人回复
ACS审稿周期多久？已经有9人回复
求助：投了RSC杂志的EES，审稿结束后编辑直接给转投到别的杂志了已经有4人回复
ACS中具体的某一期刊如何看审稿状态？已经有8人回复
加个新问题 ACS applied materials & interfaces 达审稿人意见求助已经有13人回复
catal letter的审稿周期长不长？容易中吗已经有3人回复
ACS期刊，文章被退稿，审稿意见说可以修改后重投，成功率大吗，值得吗？已经有8人回复
一次修改后ACS审稿人老说英语不好，该怎么办啊？已经有16人回复
ACS Nano审稿时间已经有11人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2013-03-04 09:53:55

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

kqp1982

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 41 (小学生)
金币: 1617.8
帖子: 1214
在线: 484.3小时
虫号: 112015

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

8楼: Originally posted by googleuboy at 2013-03-04 13:06:21
Not all the resubmitted manuscript will go to the original reviewers, if new reviewers review the paper, they might have some new comments. In this case, it is hard to say 100% of acceptance. Resubm ...

Yes, you right. However, If he can reverse the paper fully according to the reviewers, the resubmitted manuscript will not need be reviewed again. And this decision is mainly decided by the author's attitude.

[ Last edited by kqp1982 on 2013-3-4 at 20:44 ]

赞一下

回复此楼

9楼2013-03-04 14:05:00

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

查看全部 11 个回答

麦田521

铁虫 (小有名气)

应助: 29 (小学生)
金币: 15.1
帖子: 268
在线: 60.4小时
虫号: 869735

★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
esub: 金币+2, 鼓励有价值的交流 2013-03-04 11:14:14
迈步从头越: 金币+1, 谢谢! 2013-03-04 20:52:38

楼上说的太武断了吧
我看了一遍全文，没见到编辑拒搞呀，写的是让你大修major revision，具体还得看看审稿人意见，如果没那么苛刻，最好就point-by-point response，给你的修改时间是3个月，截止到01-Jun
这段文字感觉是这个期刊的大修的套话
我觉得既然都花了那么长时间投稿+审稿，还没直接拒，还是好好修改一下吧，比重投中奖几率大
祝好运

赞一下

回复此楼

3楼2013-03-04 10:29:15

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖