24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2923)
>虫友互识 (995)
>休闲灌水 (533)
>导师招生 (63)
>文献求助 (30)
>基金申请 (26)
>论文道贺祈福 (24)
>微米和纳米 (23)
>论文投稿 (22)
>博后之家 (21)
>考博 (20)
>硕博家园 (19)
>考研 (19)
>教师之家 (17)
>公派出国 (15)
>找工作 (11)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wcjhit

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 13 (小学生)
金币: 5587.1
帖子: 569
在线: 2462.8小时
虫号: 1135694

[交流] 今天收到Scripta的拒稿信，编辑和审稿人的真实意思是什么？

今天收到编辑的拒稿信，如下：
Unfortunately, we are not able to consider it for publication. The main reasons for this are that the topic would be better suited as a full-length paper. As we receive many more manuscripts than we can publish we are forced to select those we believe will interest the broadest possible section of our readership and represent a significant breakthrough of general interest. While I find your work interesting, I see that the manuscript needs to be improved. In particular, an in depth analysis of the scientific results is missing.
审稿人的意见如下：
Reviewer report:
The work reported here, although dealing with materials and seemingly of good quality, essentially has the factual and descriptive character of an experimental report. It does not contain a discussion of the reported effects and, therefore, a scientific contribution on the relation between microstructure and properties of sufficient novelty. This reviewer encourages the author to work it out to a full-length paper and check carefully the literature (f.i. xxx) submit this manuscript to a journal more focused on the relevant technological issues where it should have a much better impact. This manuscript could be the base for a good and in-depth full-length story.
编辑和审稿人都建议该结果适合写长文，同时缺少实验结果的深入分析！我想问一下：如果我再深入分析一下实验结果，还可以往Scripta上投吗？如果换一个快报期刊可以吗？例如materials letters？还是干脆就扩展写长文那？快报对实验结果的深入分析要求高吗，如果深入分析比较高的话，那干嘛还发快报那，直接就发长文了？这是第一次投外文期刊！麻烦大牛给指点迷津！万分感谢！

回复此楼