24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4530  |  回复: 76
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wcjhit

木虫 (正式写手)


[交流] 今天收到Scripta的拒稿信,编辑和审稿人的真实意思是什么?

今天收到编辑的拒稿信,如下:
Unfortunately, we are not able to consider it for publication. The main reasons for this are that the topic would be better suited as a full-length paper. As we receive many more manuscripts than we can publish we are forced to select those we believe will interest the broadest possible section of our readership and represent a significant breakthrough of general interest. While I find your work interesting, I see that the manuscript needs to be improved. In particular, an in depth analysis of the scientific results is missing.
审稿人的意见如下:
Reviewer report:
The work reported here, although dealing with materials and seemingly of good quality, essentially has the factual and descriptive character of an experimental report. It does not contain a discussion of the reported effects and, therefore, a scientific contribution on the relation between microstructure and properties of sufficient novelty.  This reviewer encourages the author to work it out to a full-length paper and check carefully the literature (f.i. xxx) submit this manuscript to a journal more focused on the relevant technological issues where it should have a much better impact.  This manuscript could be the base for a good and in-depth full-length story.
编辑和审稿人都建议该结果适合写长文,同时缺少实验结果的深入分析!我想问一下:如果我再深入分析一下实验结果,还可以往Scripta上投吗?如果换一个快报期刊可以吗?例如materials letters?还是干脆就扩展写长文那?快报对实验结果的深入分析要求高吗,如果深入分析比较高的话,那干嘛还发快报那,直接就发长文了?这是第一次投外文期刊!麻烦大牛给指点迷津!万分感谢!
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

论文投稿交流的收集

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

醋人

至尊木虫 (职业作家)



wcjhit(金币+1): 谢谢参与
可以往Scripta上投,要再深入分析一下实验结果
14楼2013-02-24 11:13:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 77 个回答

userhung

禁虫 (文学泰斗)



wcjhit(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2楼2013-02-24 10:47:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shinyzd

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)



wcjhit(金币+1): 谢谢参与
换个杂质发长文吧
3楼2013-02-24 10:47:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yj656

木虫 (著名写手)



wcjhit(金币+1): 谢谢参与
应该是楼主的文章新颖性还是比较好的,但是现象说得太多,分析的太少,所以导致这种结果。
5楼2013-02-24 10:52:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见