| ²é¿´: 347 | »Ø¸´: 2 | ||
hiqun½û³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÈÈÔ´¹¦ÂÊÉ趨£¬ÔÚ6000ʱ£¬Õý³£ÊÕÁ²£¬µ±Îª10000ʱ£¬±¨´í
|
|
×𾴵ĸ÷λ°æÖ÷£¬¸ßÊÖ£º ÔÚÕæ¿Õ·øÉäµÄ¼ÆËã¹ý³ÌÖУ¬ÈÈÔ´¹¦ÂÊÉ趨Ϊ6000W/m^3ʱ£¬¼ÆËã½á¹û×î¸ßζÈΪ1000K£¬ÊÕÁ²ÎÞÎÊÌâ¡£µ±¼ÌÐøÔö¼Ó¹¦ÂÊÖÁ10000W/m^3ʱ£¬¼ÆË㱨´í£¬²»ÖªÄÄλ¸ßÊÖ¸øÓè½â´ðÏ¡£Ð»Ð»¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
295Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸C9µÄ»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì£¨085602£© 340·Ö£¬¸Ð¾õУÄÚµ÷¼ÁÎÞÍû£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
363Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
283·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤306·ÖÕÒºÏÊʵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤085600 310·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
292Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸9²ÄÁÏѧ˶297ÒѹýÁù¼¶Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ssaw66
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 500.2
- É¢½ð: 336
- ºì»¨: 1
- ɳ·¢: 9
- Ìû×Ó: 481
- ÔÚÏß: 203.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1799834
- ×¢²á: 2012-05-06
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÏà¹Ø½»²æÁìÓò
2Â¥2013-02-02 20:07:19
hiqun
½û³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 19 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.012
- ½ð±Ò: 408.2
- É¢½ð: 579
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 370
- ÔÚÏß: 75.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1057226
- ×¢²á: 2010-07-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »¯Ñ§¶¯Á¦Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: ·ÂտģÄâ
|
°³µÃµ½µÄÕý½â£º One issue one can easily get with dissusion equations is that, in transient studies particularly, the gradients from the initial conditions are very steep, and the mesh being used is not compatible (too coarse in certain regions). If you are in stationary, what you can ry is to ramp up the power with a solver - contianuation tab - prametrical sweep case and increase the power in 5-10 steps, then each solver case is using the previous results as starting point, and often this allows you to reach your max flux values |
3Â¥2013-02-04 09:34:39














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
120