| ²é¿´: 2007 | »Ø¸´: 16 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
weijian1215ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Ö÷±àµÄÒ»¾ä»°Ã»¿´¶®¡°...should I be incorrect in my conclusion¡± Çë½Ìһϴó¼Ò
|
|
|
Æä¼¸Ìì¸ÕͶÏò¡¶Signal Processing¡·Í¶ÁËÆªÎÄÕ£¬µÈÁË10Ìì×óÓÒ±»Ö÷±à¾Ü¸åÁË£¬ÔÒòÊÇÎÒÎÄÕÂÖеÄtopic²»ÊÊºÏ¸ÃÆÚ¿¯¡£ ÎÒµÄÂÛÎÄÊǹØÓÚÐźŵ¼ÏòʸÁ¿Ê§ÅäʱµÄÐźżì²âÎÊÌ⣬Ӧ¸Ã·Ç³£ÊÊºÏ¸ÃÆÚ¿¯¡£ÎÒµÄ×î´óʧÎóÓ¦¸ÃÊÇûÒýÓá¶Signal Processing¡·ÉÏÃæµÄ²Î¿¼ÎÄÏס£ ÎÒÏòÖ÷±à·´²µ£¨Ã»ÌἰδÒýÓá¶Signal Processing¡·ÉϵIJο¼ÎÄÏ×Õâ¸öÎÊÌ⣩ Ö÷±à¸ø»ØÁË·âÐÅ£¬¹Ø¼üÒ»¾ä»°Ã»¿´¶®£¬Çë½Ìһϴó¼ÒÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¬¼ûÏÂÃæºìÉ«×ÖÌ壺 Dear Author, Thank you for your email and query about the editorial decision on your paper. The scope of SIGNAL PROCESSING has narrowed compared to 3-4 years ago and acceptance of papers is much more selective. If all previous work in a subfield of signal processing has appeared in other journals, we are not necessarily going to consider the paper for this journal. In this case, other journals may be more suitable for the dissemination of the results. I do not want to discourage a resubmission of your work should I be incorrect in my conclusion, this is the reason for the formulation below. Sincerely, *** *** ºÃÏñ±à¼±»Ã»¾Ü¾øÎÒÖØÍ¶Ò»±é¡£ ÎÒÏëÔö¼Ó¡¶Signal Processing¡·ÉϵIJο¼ÎÄÏ׺óÖØÍ¶Ò»±é¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
260Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũҵ071010£¬320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ç󲩵¼£üÉúÎïÖÊ»ù¶à¿×̼/³¬¼¶µçÈÝ·½Ïò£¬ÒÑÓÐÏà¹Ø³É¹û£¬Ñ°ÄÜÔ´²ÄÁÏ/̼²ÄÁÏ·½ÏòÀÏʦ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¶þ±½¼×ͪËáÀàÑÜÉúÎï
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
½ÓÊÜÈκε÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öпƴó²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¬353·Ö»¹Óе÷¼ÁѧУÂð
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
295·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
294Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
liguan525
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 915.2
- É¢½ð: 179
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 204
- ÔÚÏß: 72.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 866542
- ×¢²á: 2009-10-09
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ×÷ÎïÖÖÖÊ×ÊÔ´ÓëÒÅ´«ÓýÖÖѧ
17Â¥2013-05-31 15:41:28
vect
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 171 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 18942.5
- É¢½ð: 31
- ºì»¨: 19
- Ìû×Ó: 2033
- ÔÚÏß: 938.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 545022
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Êýѧ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
|
I do not want to discourage a resubmission of your work should I be incorrect in my conclusion, this is the reason for the formulation below. ºÃÏñÊDz»¹ÄÀøÖØÍ¶¸Ã¿¯Îï¡£´óÒâÊǸÿ¯ÎïµÄ¿¯µÇ·¶Î§½Ï¼¸ÄêǰÏÁÕÁËÐí¶à£¬¶øÇÒ¿ÉÑ¡ÔñµÄÂÛÎÄÒ²ºÜ¶àÖ®ÀàµÄ£¬×îºó½²Èç¹ûÎÒÔ¸Òâ·¸´íÎóµÄ»°£¬ÎÒ²»»á²»¹ÄÀøÄãÖØÍ¶µÄ¡£¼´ÎÒ²»·¸´íÎóµÄ»°£¬¾Í²»½¨ÒéÄãÖØÍ¶ÁË¡£ |
2Â¥2013-02-01 21:46:20
weijian1215
ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2437.3
- É¢½ð: 116
- Ìû×Ó: 478
- ÔÚÏß: 77.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 470703
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-29
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÐźÅÀíÂÛÓëÐźŴ¦Àí
3Â¥2013-02-01 22:00:28
vect
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 171 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 18942.5
- É¢½ð: 31
- ºì»¨: 19
- Ìû×Ó: 2033
- ÔÚÏß: 938.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 545022
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Êýѧ
4Â¥2013-02-01 22:08:23













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥