| 查看: 3359 | 回复: 76 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
shuixian2009木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
[Weekly Topic] What is your opinion?
|
||
Lots of persons are talking about the price of standing ticket. As we know, there are four classes on the train: soft berth, hard sleeper, soft seat, hard seat. The prices are lowered accordingly. But now people have to cost equal money to buy a standing ticket when the hard seat tickets are sold out. Most hold a view that the passengers who have to stand on the train should pay half of the hard seat fare for their standing tickets. What is your opinion? [ Last edited by fungixx on 2013-1-16 at 11:30 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
40+中年人失业后,还能找到好工作吗?
已经有15人回复
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有5人回复
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗?
已经有12人回复
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有6人回复
极限拉扯,如何抉择
已经有15人回复
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了,离AI做有机合成还有多远?
已经有13人回复
课题组会帮你通过考核么?
已经有7人回复
招收博士生一名
已经有3人回复

★ ★ ★
May2012: 金币+3, if it can come true....lots of people will be very happy.... 2013-01-15 19:10:24
May2012: 金币+3, if it can come true....lots of people will be very happy.... 2013-01-15 19:10:24
I think that standing ticket should a little lower than the price of hard seat ticket. But if the price of the standing ticket is only half of the hard seat ticket, I'll be very happy, although it is not sustainable for the development and Inovation of service. |

14楼2013-01-15 18:57:34
readytogo
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
瓜帅-催化剂
-

专家经验: +150 - 应助: 735 (博后)
- 贵宾: 46.834
- 金币: 140720
- 散金: 30720
- 红花: 401
- 沙发: 997
- 帖子: 85926
- 在线: 5149.2小时
- 虫号: 481323
- 注册: 2007-12-17
- 专业: 催化化学
- 管辖: 科研生活区编辑部

2楼2013-01-15 14:49:31
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-

专家经验: +14 - 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345452
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127555
- 在线: 8880.9小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿

3楼2013-01-15 14:51:36
乐小
木虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 1
- 应助: 14 (小学生)
- 金币: 1218.2
- 散金: 762
- 红花: 9
- 沙发: 89
- 帖子: 3435
- 在线: 831.6小时
- 虫号: 1698616
- 注册: 2012-03-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 神道教
4楼2013-01-15 14:56:35










回复此楼
although it is not sustainable for the development and Inovation of service.
I think it is not a good idea.