| 查看: 2663 | 回复: 76 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
shuixian2009木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
[Weekly Topic] What is your opinion?
|
||
Lots of persons are talking about the price of standing ticket. As we know, there are four classes on the train: soft berth, hard sleeper, soft seat, hard seat. The prices are lowered accordingly. But now people have to cost equal money to buy a standing ticket when the hard seat tickets are sold out. Most hold a view that the passengers who have to stand on the train should pay half of the hard seat fare for their standing tickets. What is your opinion? [ Last edited by fungixx on 2013-1-16 at 11:30 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有49人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
★ ★ ★
May2012: 金币+3, if it can come true....lots of people will be very happy.... 2013-01-15 19:10:24
May2012: 金币+3, if it can come true....lots of people will be very happy.... 2013-01-15 19:10:24
I think that standing ticket should a little lower than the price of hard seat ticket. But if the price of the standing ticket is only half of the hard seat ticket, I'll be very happy, although it is not sustainable for the development and Inovation of service. |
14楼2013-01-15 18:57:34
readytogo
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
瓜帅-催化剂
-
专家经验: +150 - 应助: 735 (博后)
- 贵宾: 46.834
- 金币: 140720
- 散金: 30720
- 红花: 401
- 沙发: 997
- 帖子: 85926
- 在线: 5149.2小时
- 虫号: 481323
- 注册: 2007-12-17
- 专业: 催化化学
- 管辖: 科研生活区编辑部
2楼2013-01-15 14:49:31
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345462
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127553
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
I think it is not a good idea.3楼2013-01-15 14:51:36
乐小
木虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 1
- 应助: 14 (小学生)
- 金币: 1218.2
- 散金: 762
- 红花: 9
- 沙发: 89
- 帖子: 3435
- 在线: 831.6小时
- 虫号: 1698616
- 注册: 2012-03-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 神道教
4楼2013-01-15 14:56:35