| 查看: 2707 | 回复: 6 | |||
[交流]
【求助】一篇SCI文章的二审意见，跪求鉴定！
|
|||
|
文章一审后进行了认真修改，今天刚刚收到二审意见（见后），原来是三个审稿人，这次只返回了2个审稿人，其中一个审稿人的意见让我很困惑，不知怎么回复，他说我的文章写的很好，但是不适合在这个期刊发表（一审二审都是这个意见），但是主编仍然在让我修改，这怎么回复啊？ Dear Dr. **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below or the attachments in your account), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #3: Overall, the paper is well written, but I still stand behind my initial review that it is not suitable for publication in APEN. The topic is of general interest and it may be suitable for an Elsevier J. on solar energy or renewable energy resources. Reviewer #4: The authors have substantially revised the paper and addressed most of the comments. However, there are still a few comments for further response. There are many symbols in the manuscript and nomenclature should be provided. The authors should state the main differences between meteorological and solar radiation observation stations. The data points presented in Fig 3 are still rather scattered. Strong evidence should be given to support the argument 'good ternary regression relationships'. More statistical indices may be required. The mathematical expressions including the input data for computing the parameters B and C should be provided. [ Last edited by tonio on 2013-1-12 at 19:08 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今天务委会开完了，明天出结果吗
已经有8人回复
-
在坚冰还盖着北海的时候，我看到了怒放的梅花。
已经有7人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有22人回复
-
某些机构，以效率低为荣，以效率低作为存在感
已经有9人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有18人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有13人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有8人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有10人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有11人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有22人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
3楼2013-01-12 19:19:41
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
4楼2013-01-12 19:20:04
5楼2013-01-12 19:57:49
6楼2013-01-13 15:35:37
7楼2013-01-13 16:04:43
简单回复
假大空2楼
2013-01-12 18:48
回复
