| 查看: 2574 | 回复: 9 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
furymiss金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
没有什么不好的意见啊，怎么还给拒了呢？？郁闷！
|
||
|
I am sorry to advise you that our reviewers have considered your paper but unfortunately feel it is unsuitable for publication in IJPR. For your information the reviewer(s) comments are attached to the end of this letter. Please note that fuller review reports may also be attached to this email. In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) I must decline the manuscript for publication in the International Journal of Production Research and you are now free to submit the paper elsewhere. However, since the referees do find some merit in the paper, if after you have considered the reviews you wish to undertake the substantial additional work and rewriting that is needed, I am willing to receive a new submission that fully responds to the review comments. Please refer to the previous submission and the original reference number if making a re-submission and include a detailed account of the revisions made. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review. Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 1. Is the paper a research contribution, or is it a case study, a review, or a discussion? Research contribution. 2. Does the paper make a new and significant contribution to the literature in its own area? The method for solving the problem is fairly good. But it can not to say that they make a new and significant contribution to the literature. 3. Does the paper appropriately compare the performance of proposed methodologies with those found in the published literature? The authors propose four method to solve the problem. They compare their own method to each other. The conclusion is obvious. 4. Does the paper provide evidence of real or potential application for advancing manufacturing practice? Yes. The proposed method can be applied for the real situation. 5. Is it a report of work done by the author(s) and does it state what the author(s) propose to do in the future? The writing stylish of the paper is poor. The autors should work more to improve their work presentation. In my opinion, It is diffucat for the reader to read the paper completely and can underastand what the authors want to say. 6. Is adequate credit given to other contributors in the field and are references sufficiently complete? (Please indicate any significant omissions.) Yes. 7. Are the character and contents of the paper clear from the title and abstract? Yes. 8. Is the paper clearly, concisely, accurately and logically written? Are there any errors? Could it benefit from condensing or expansion? (Please give details.) The framework of the paper is logical; however the authors should abstract some technical part of the paper. By removing or abstract these parts of the paper reader can better understood what the authors done : Page 6 Line 21-44, Section 2.1, ... . Authors could define a new problem. Propose their solving method and finally in the computational part of the paper propose the method for the real application. 9. Is the subject matter of relevance to manufacturing and appropriate to IJPR? Is it more suitable to another journal? The subject of the paper is proper to publish in IJPR. Scientific aspect of the work is good. Unfortunately, the writing stylish of the paper is poor and it is not adequate to publish in the journal. Comments to the Author - In page 13 Line 54 why W can be considered as continues variable. - Why in equation 10n can equal only to 1,2,3 and 4? - In figure 3 box” i>I” should be joint to Box “Get an …” 请各位虫友给点意见或建议！！万分感谢！ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 SCI写作、投稿、经验 |
» 猜你喜欢
澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生（3个名额）地质化工冶金领域
已经有32人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有27人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有10人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有10人回复
-
阿姨
已经有4人回复
-
一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗
已经有4人回复
-
静等基金结果
已经有21人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有28人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有6人回复
-
filecode
已经有16人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 博士今年7月到某二本高校工作，9月初办理解约手续，遇到困难★2012年10月13日更新
已经有57人回复
- 初审退稿，郁闷着呢，大家看看是写的不好吗？
已经有25人回复
- 感冒总不好，郁闷啊
已经有8人回复
- 文章被人家说得一无是处，心情极度郁闷！
已经有41人回复
- 我都快郁闷死了，做磷酸铁锂扣式全电池怎么做也做不好，但钴、锰都可以
已经有33人回复
- 【转载】从留美幼童的“后遗症”看中美两国教育之差异
已经有14人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
7楼2013-01-08 10:34:25
2楼2013-01-07 23:46:55
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
furymiss: 金币+1 2013-01-16 08:47:14
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
furymiss: 金币+1 2013-01-16 08:47:14
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2013-01-08 07:07:55
ll9999
专家顾问 (文坛精英)
-
专家经验: +584 - SEPI: 2
- 应助: 8021 (教授)
- 贵宾: 60.073
- 金币: 290579
- 散金: 2941
- 红花: 710
- 沙发: 28
- 帖子: 37510
- 在线: 3178.5小时
- 虫号: 1410396
- 注册: 2011-09-21
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 区域发展管理
- 管辖: 电脑使用
4楼2013-01-08 08:27:43
