24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

fengsong

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 119.9
散金: 10
帖子: 108
在线: 29.1小时
虫号: 579507
注册: 2008-07-04
性别: GG
专业: 机械摩擦学与表面技术

[交流] 投稿等了两个月，有结果了，但副主编给的回复让人纠结呀已有7人参与

下面是副主编给的审稿结果，副主编似乎有点想要要拒的意思，有点纠结。修改还有希望吗？
I am pleased to inform you that the peer-reviews of your manuscript  have been completed.  Based on the reviews, I have concluded that the manuscript can be published in Tribology Transactions if the following revisions are made.

Comments from the reviewers are shown at the bottom of this email. You will note that  one reviewer is very favorable toward your manuscript, while one other reviewer considers it totally misplaced because, as written, it cannot be reproduced, as in an experiment. I tend to agree with the comments of the reviewer who considers this manuscript not suitable for Tribology Transactions in its current form.

Thus you and coauthors have two choices:  you can either rewrite the manuscript so its work can be reproduced, and some of the comments of the third reviewer may help you to do this, but you must work hard at this goal; or you can submit your manuscript to a different journal as suggested by Reviewer 1. In order for the text to be re-produced, you must be able to define the lubricants very clearly.