| ²é¿´: 4713 | »Ø¸´: 29 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
smallbug2000ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÕâÆªÎÄÕÂÖØÍ¶Í¬Ò»ÆÚ¿¯»¹ÓÐÏ£ÍûÂð£¿
|
||
|
ͶÁËһƪÎÄÕµ½¡°¼ÆËã»úÊÓ¾õ£¬Í¼Ïñ¡±·½ÃæµÄÒ»¸öSCIÆÚ¿¯£¨IF>1.0£©£¬×î½üÊÕµ½¾Ü¸åÐÅ£¬ËäÈ»±»¾Ü£¬µ«ÊDz»ÖªµÀÊDZ༻¹ÊÇjournal manger¹ÄÀøÎÒÖØÍ¶£¬¸÷λ´óÉñ°ïÎÒ¿´¿´£¬»¹ÓбØÒªÖØÍ¶¸ÃÆÚ¿¯»¹ÊǸÄͶÆäËüÆÚ¿¯£¿²¢·ÖÎöÀû±×¡£¸Ðл£¬¸½Ðż°Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÈçÏ£º Dear *, This is in regard to your above-referenced manuscript, which you submitted for publication in *. We regret to inform you that the Editors have found your paper is not suitable for publication in * for reasons given in the reviews included below. While you may be disappointed by this decision, I would like to urge you to continue to consider ¡°¸ÃÆÚ¿¯¡±for publication of future manuscripts. However, please do not submit the rejected manuscript as a new submission to this journal. Sincerely, * Journal Manager Journal of * E-mail: * Editor's comments: There are in total three reviews returned for this manuscript. While one of the reviewers rated it to be accepted with minor and mandatory changes, the other two reviewers have raised a lot of issues about the proposed approach as well as the experiments. Especially, the concerns of this paper are three folds: 1) insufficient novelty; 2) limited experiments with simple data set; 3) missing important technical details. Considering that these two reviewers have more extensive background in related areas, the editor is taking their recommendations and rejecting this manuscript. Nevertheless, the authors are encouraged to resubmit the paper after they have significantly improved its quality and content. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Ϊʲô¹ú×ÔÈ»²»ÄÜÖ±½Ó¹«²¼
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÄÄλ¸ßÈËÖÐÁË£¬°Ñ²éѯµ½µÄ½ØÍ¼Ìù³öÀ´ÈÃÎÒ¿´¿´£¬ÈÃÎÒ³¤³¤¼ûʶ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ϵͳ²é²»µ½
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¿ÆÑй¶ùÌ«ÄÑÁË
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
Ôõô²é°¡
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¹úºÏÀïÃæÄÜ¿´µ½ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¹ú¼ÊºÏ×÷¿É²éÁË£¬ÖÐÁËÃæÉÏ
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÄÜ·ñÍ˳ö²ÎÓëµÄÃæÉÏÏîÄ¿½â³ýÏÞÏî
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
ϵͳ½ø²»È¥
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
qhd511
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 324 (´óѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 6915.3
- É¢½ð: 226
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 1922
- ÔÚÏß: 390.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1079710
- ×¢²á: 2010-08-22
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§
18Â¥2013-01-04 08:24:01
ll9999
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +584 - SEPI: 2
- Ó¦Öú: 8021 (½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 60.073
- ½ð±Ò: 290579
- É¢½ð: 2941
- ºì»¨: 710
- ɳ·¢: 28
- Ìû×Ó: 37510
- ÔÚÏß: 3178.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1410396
- ×¢²á: 2011-09-21
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÇøÓò·¢Õ¹¹ÜÀí
- ¹ÜϽ: µçÄÔʹÓÃ
2Â¥2013-01-03 13:45:44
rockinuk
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 1512 (½²Ê¦)
- ½ð±Ò: 7810.9
- É¢½ð: 189
- ºì»¨: 106
- Ìû×Ó: 3982
- ÔÚÏß: 570.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1945379
- ×¢²á: 2012-08-19
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÊýÂÛ

3Â¥2013-01-03 13:48:29
founder
ľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 337 (´óѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 12473.2
- É¢½ð: 480
- ºì»¨: 16
- ɳ·¢: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 9881
- ÔÚÏß: 772.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 27787
- ×¢²á: 2003-10-25
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ӻϳɻ¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
smallbug2000: ½ð±Ò+1 2013-01-04 13:20:41
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
smallbug2000: ½ð±Ò+1 2013-01-04 13:20:41
| ¿ÉÒÔÐ޸ĺóÔÙͶÊÔÒ»ÊÔ »ò¸ÄͶ |

4Â¥2013-01-03 14:28:41









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
28