| ²é¿´: 2155 | »Ø¸´: 20 | |||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||||
ysm56789ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
ÂæÍÕ
|
[½»Á÷]
Money=Happy or problems?
|
||||
|
Being rich is a dream for everyone because we can live a comfortable lifestyle with sufficient financial support. Due to this reason, some people hold the view that money is equal to happiness. However, others argue that money also brings problems and it is not directly link to personal happiness. Admittedly, everyone needs money to support their daily living demands such as clothes, food, accomadation and transportation. People can enjoy pretty luxury life with sufficient fund. Without the money, there is no way to talk about happiness, even surviving. In this case, money is the primary factor for being happy, which is essential around the globe. However, this does not mean that money is equal to happiness because of its disadvantages. To begin with, money is a major source of family conflicts on the relationship between family members. This is exemplified in the family which has no time to enjoy the holiday or weekend, but earn money. In that family, even they maybe rich in money, but the family relationship may be under great tension without enough communication. Secondly, money can cause issues on heritage from upper generation. This is especially true in rich family on how to distribute and share the family heritage. When the conflicts are unable to solve in short period of time, the whole family members may be quite unhappy. And this situation may persist if the problem is not solved. In summary, I maintain that money is not a key factor for being happy, although everyone needs it. A comfortable family relationship and sufficient communication are more important. [ Last edited by ysm56789 on 2012-12-28 at 20:35 ] |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
EC~cabbage and radish soup | ¡¾Æ»¹ûÃá¿Ó¢Óï ΪÃÎÏë |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũ΢ÉúÎ288·Ö£¬ÈýÄêʵÑé¾Àú
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
269Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
268·Ö085602»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ìµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
071000ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
296Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйú¿ÆÑ§ÔºÉϺ£ÓлúËù£¬Óлú»¯Ñ§356·ÖÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
367Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
086003µ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´

henanlkf
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2659.5
- É¢½ð: 1572
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 408
- ÔÚÏß: 196.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1166757
- ×¢²á: 2010-12-10
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ×ÔÈ»µØÀíѧ
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
winter_north: ½ð±Ò+3, Donate 70%, use 30% for self. 2012-12-28 20:52:27
winter_north: ½ð±Ò+3, Donate 70%, use 30% for self. 2012-12-28 20:52:27
| this issue has been argued for many times, i think the core of the argument is that when you have lots of money, do you have the ability to control yourself using right way to spend your money. Just like the different ways of thinking of money between the rich men of our nation and US. |
8Â¥2012-12-28 20:07:41
¶ÅΰÐÛ
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 21 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1887.3
- É¢½ð: 619
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 874
- ÔÚÏß: 180.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2015040
- ×¢²á: 2012-09-20
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì

4Â¥2012-12-28 18:52:12
kambo_tju
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1000.6
- Ìû×Ó: 139
- ÔÚÏß: 134.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2157504
- ×¢²á: 2012-11-30
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÖÆÔìϵͳÓë×Ô¶¯»¯

5Â¥2012-12-28 19:03:22
larry201212
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 45.1
- Ìû×Ó: 7
- ÔÚÏß: 1.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2208627
- ×¢²á: 2012-12-27
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ö×Áö×ÛºÏÖÎÁÆ

6Â¥2012-12-28 19:50:10













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

Yeah it's a nice writting for CET-6. But the idea and the structure very nice.