| 查看: 381 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
3句话...比较长...谢谢了~
|
||
| A putative counter-example is brought forth against Copernicanism and the diurnal motion of the earth (balls falling, cannons booming), and there is a possible simple minded interpretation of it. Galileo contrasts that simple interpretation, likely to be given by an uncritical person or by one who is not intellectually open minded, i.e., by Simplicio the Aristotelian, with another interpretation that makes sense out of the example according to the Copernican theory. Indeed, Copernicus himself is praised because he did not let his common sense rule his interpretation. Rather he was a genius who went beyond the obvious common |
回复此楼
2楼2012-12-14 12:16:16
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
220chengeng: 金币+1, 感谢应助。 2012-12-15 10:46:22
unknownbq: 金币+25, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★很有帮助 2012-12-18 10:59:58
220chengeng: 金币+1, 感谢应助。 2012-12-15 10:46:22
unknownbq: 金币+25, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★很有帮助 2012-12-18 10:59:58
|
一个公认的反对哥白尼学说及地球周日运动说的反面例子产生了，且对此可能还有一个头脑简单的解释。伽利略将那个可能是某个轻率的或者思维不开阔的人（如亚里士多德派的Simplicio）提出的简单解释，与另外依据哥白尼的理论对该例子给出的较合理的解释两相对比。的确，哥白尼本人是受到褒奖的，因为他并没有让自己的常识来支配他的理解。相反，他是个超越了显而易见的常识的天才。 balls falling, cannons booming这个例子不好理解。楼主根据上下文可能给出比较合理的解释。 |
3楼2012-12-14 14:58:09