24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1109  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

moishel

银虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 诚求高见

各位高手帮忙看一下,
Reviewer 1
Review of "The static wide field-of-view polarization Michelson interferometer for Mars atmosphere survey" by Zhang Xuanni and Zhang Chunmin.

The authors survey the requirements for polarimetric imaging of the Mars atmosphere, provide the hardware layout for their SWFPMI instrument, and discuss some of the design details and tolerancing requirements. As written, the paper contains a large number of errors in grammar and phrasing, which occasionally cause confusion. (For example, Figure 3 shows a CCD array, while the text mentions a HgCdTe detector array.) But more important, I think that the material itself is not important enough to be of interest to readers of Applied Optics. The authors provide only the system preliminary design, and the lack of any measurements indicate that they have not actually built it. It is far to easy to miss important facts in a design until it has been built, and this is why only the most novel formulations are published without data. Without showing actual measurements, the design has to be quite compelling, and I don't see that here. Thus, I cannot recommend its publication.



Reviewer 2
this is a great paper, you guys did an excellent work

But the follow mainor issue need to be fixed

1). Table 1 need reformat, see the first line


2), Table 2, should change chinese to Glass taype
还好编辑给的是大修,请问各位该怎么回复评审专家1,恳求各位了!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huiyuan2012

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
moishel: 金币+2, 有帮助 2012-11-30 09:15:49
写作上语言错误很多,需要认真修改。最好找洋人看看
7楼2012-11-29 23:13:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

zhywu

新虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
moishel: 金币+3, 有帮助 2012-11-29 17:42:02
zhenghaiw: 金币+1, 言之有理! 2012-11-29 20:25:39
认真回答第一个人的问题,第二个只是简单的修改,祝福
2楼2012-11-29 17:32:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
zhenghaiw: 金币+2, 感谢热心参与! 2012-11-29 20:25:55
moishel: 金币+2 2012-11-30 09:14:57
moishel: 金币+1, 有帮助 2012-11-30 09:15:23
review 1的意见:一是写作上语法文字错误很多,需要大改。
二是整个研究就是一个初步设计,没有测试数据,这个不能接受的。
第一条好改,第二条可能比较难,除非你们已经做了或者准备做测试
3楼2012-11-29 18:02:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nuaawq

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
zhenghaiw: 金币+1, 鼓励参与! 2012-11-29 20:26:13
moishel: 金币+2, 有帮助 2012-11-30 09:14:38
第一个意见是写作上语法文字错误很多,需要好好修改啊。。第二个意见是整个研究的初步设计,没有测试数据,这个不太行的。。
4楼2012-11-29 18:49:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见