¹ý³ÌÈçÏ£ºÎÄÕÂͶ¸åºóunder Editorial board review 5Ì죬ÍíÉÏÎÒCheck ״̬±ä³ÉÁËunder editor review, ÎÒÏëÕâÏÂÓ¦¸ÃûÊÂÁË£¬¿ÉÒÔËÍÉóÁË¡£Ã»Ïëµ½µÚ¶þÌìÔçÉϱäΪPending for final recommendation£¬ÄѵÀEditorÒ²Äܾܸ壿
×îÓôÃÆµÄÊÇÕâ¸öeditorµÄÒâ¼û£º
Editorial Board Member's Remarks to Author:
Your model regarding ¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£ is indeed very interesting and of potential interest to the readership of the PNAS. However at the present state of development, the central hypothesis of this work remains insufficiently supported to pass the high bar for publication in the proceedings, and hence I am returning this manuscript to you with out review so that you might consider whether more rapid publication in an alternative venue would be in your best interest.