| 查看: 134 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
【转帖】Windpower Workshop
|
||
|
Windpower Workshop Publisher: Centre for Alternative Technology Number Of Pages: 160 Publication Date: 2001-08-01 Sales Rank: 34989 ISBN / ASIN: 1898049203 EAN: 9781898049203 Binding: Paperback Manufacturer: Centre for Alternative Technology Studio: Centre for Alternative Technology Average Rating: 4.5 As the financial and environmental costs of fossil fuels continue to rise, the ancient art of windpower is making a steady comeback, and many countries are promoting wind energy generation as part of a drive toward a sustainable future. Yet many environmental enthusiasts prefer a more do-it-yourself approach. Windpower Workshop provides all the essential information for people wanting to build and maintain a windpower system for their own energy needs. Hugh Piggott runs his own succesful windpower business in Scotland. Review: Good information, but felt incomplete I wanted to like this book. I really did. So many people who are wind power enthusiasts kept telling me how seminal a book this is, but it was a disappointment, albeit a subjective one. I think more accurate thing to say would be that it was not the book I was looking for. I can say objectively if you want information on how a grid-tied wind turbine system should work, this book has almost no information on the entire grid-tying process, a complicated and expensive process that certainly a lot of people would need help with. I can also say objectively that this book helped me realize that wind power would not be a good choice for my current home. I think the problem I have with this book is twofold. One, the book is written on a fairly high level. Some formulas for wind power are presented, some general heuristics, and these are important to be sure, but they don't actually help you get your head wrapped around the issues at stake. There are electrical schematics presented in some places. I'm a fairly technical person, and I can read a schematic fairly well. Sometimes I can't tell whether a symbol is a dynamo or an alternator (they don't look the same but they are similar in practice). But of course an electrical schmatic does not a wind generating electrical system make, and this should not reflect badly on the author. The other thing is Piggott's really heavily invested in presenting a balanced view of the information. Seems like a counter-intuitive criticism but I had a hard time figuring out what his personal opinion about different designs of turbines, towers, furlings, generators, etc. were. I would have preferd that he say. "This is what works for me, and this is why I think it works." Instead of "You can do this. Or you can do this. Or you can do this... etc". http://rapidshare.com/files/40139016/wind_power_workshop.pdf.html [ Last edited by cuplgz on 2008-2-23 at 16:02 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有3人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有7人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有4人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复