24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

本帖产生 1 个翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

oink

银虫 (著名写手)

应助: 5 (幼儿园)
金币: 1621.8
散金: 1899
红花: 9
帖子: 1342
在线: 451.2小时
虫号: 1206552
注册: 2011-02-19
性别: MM
专业: 食品科学基础

[求助] 跪求翻译，急

Further increase in the grinding times to 6 (for PAL-6, PAL-8 and PAL-
10 samples), the intensity of the characteristic diffraction peak at
2θ=8.38° (d=10.6 Å

[24] remarkably decreased and the other
peaks had no obvious change, indicating that the repeated grinding
treatment with high intensity would affect the crystal structure of
PAL to certain extent and slightly reduced its order–disorder structural
degree [26], which was an advantageous property for well-defined
adsorbents [27], as validated by the following adsorption results for
MB. The intensity of the peak at 2θ=8.38° (d=10.6 Å

[24] for
PAL-6 was lowest, increased for PAL-8 and decreased for PAL-10.
This may be according to following reasons: for PAL-6, the crystal
aggregates were dissociated and crystal rods were shortened, thusleading to large degree of destructiveness in crystal structure; for
PAL-8, more stressing force acted on the sample, and then crystal
structure was further affected. The crystal rods would rearrange due
to minimum energy principle, leading to the crystal structure was
recovered to a certain extent; whereas for PAL-10, superabundant
stressing force operated on the sample, and then crystal structure
was affected so serious that it was difficult to be recovered
3.4. Effect of grinding treatment on specific surface area
Specific surface area is one of the most crucial physical-chemical
properties of an adsorbent as to remove heavy metal ions and dyes.
Liu et al. [28] found that the specific surface area of CTA+-REC had
significant effect on the removal of anionic dye Congo red, and the
similar results were reported by Chen et al. [29]. Thus, the effect of
grinding times on specific surface area of PAL was investigated and
shown in Table 1. SBET and Smicro of PAL-0 were only 153 and 28 m2/g,
respectively. The SBET was greatly enhanced after grinding treatment.
The SBET firstly increased to 229 m2/g for PAL-2, and then decreased to
184 m2/g for PAL-6. With further increasing the grinding times to 8,
the SBET increased to 213 m2/g and kept constant. Furthermore, the tendency
of Sext/SBET ratio versus grinding times was quite the reverse of
the SBET and only little change in the value of Sext can be found. For
PAL samples with grinding treatment, the Sext/SBET ratio increased
until PAL-6 and then decreased with increasing grinding times due to
the change in the SBET, indicating grinding treatment had insignificant
effect on the Sext. The tendencies in Smicro and the Smicro/SBET ratio with
grinding timeswere in linewith the obtained for SBET. Itwas also clearly
observed that Smicro increased with the grinding times until PAL-2 and
then decreased until PAL-6 and finally increased. The Smicro of PAL
with grinding treatment was higher than that initial PAL-0 value. In
all, the SBET of grinding treated PAL was obviously higher than that of
PAL-0 due to the increase in Smicro. This was attributed to that the rod-like crystals of PAL become shorter after grinding treatment as validated
by FESEMimages, which led to the increase inmicroparticles, and then
resulted in the increase of Smicro
3.5. Effect of grinding treatment on pore-size distribution
The pore size of an adsorbent material exhibits great influence on
the adsorption capacity for dyes or metal ions, especially for adsorbates
with large and complex molecular structures. In this case, the
effect of grinding treatment on pore-size distribution for PAL samples
was studied and illustrated in Fig. 4. As shown in the inset of Fig. 4,
the first peak at about 3.5 nm for PAL-0, 3.6 nm for PAL-2 and PAL-
4, 3.8 nm for PAL-6, PAL-8 and PAL-10 was ascribed to the mesopores
between layers of PAL and furthermore, as pore size was in the range
of 0 and 8.0 nm, the peak area was in the order of PAL-4>PAL-2>
PAL-0>PAL-6>PAL-8>PAL-10, suggesting the mesopore volume
had the same sequence except PAL-0 and PAL-4. It was clear from
Fig. 4 that another peak at 30 nm for PAL-0 and 28 nm for PAL-2,
PAL-4, PAL-6 and PAL-8 and 29 nm for PAL-10 was corresponding to
non-structural pores between microparticles of PAL. In addition, the
first set of peaks were small and narrow attributed to the inner surface
area, while the second set of peaks were large and broad attributed
to the outer surface area of PAL. This means that the pores
present an irregular size distribution [30,31]. Furthermore, the results
suggested that the non-structural pores among microparticles of PAL
were dominant and responsible for the large proportion of the pore
volume and specific surface area. It can be also seen from Fig. 4 the
non-structural pore of PAL-2, PAL-4, PAL-6, PAL-8 and PAL-10 was a
little smaller than that of PAL-0. This may be due to that the change
of crystal aggregates and the break of rod-like crystals of PAL. The
strong compression and shearing action resulting from the stone miller
disc led to the rearrangement of crystal bundles and the stack of
crystals became compact, which caused a small decrease in nonstructural
pores of PAL-2, PAL-4, PAL-6, PAL-8 and PAL-10 and thechange in structure of crystal aggregates. Due to strong shearing
forces induced by the stone miller operating on the PAL, crystal aggregates,
bundles were dissociated and part of single crystals were shortened.
According to the Van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds,
part of dissociated crystal aggregates, bundles and single crystals
would rearrange and part of the interstitial spaces between the crystal
aggregates would change according to minimum energy principle.
Under these conditions, shortened crystals would be more compact. A
slight decrease of intensity in the second peak set and the increase of
intensity in the first peak set with grinding treatment were observed.
Thus there was a slight change in pore volume of PAL after grinding
treatment and the extent in change depended on the decreasing
extent in the second set of peak and increasing extent in the first
set of peak

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

1楼 2012-10-18 19:48:47

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

睢园绿竹

禁虫 (职业作家)

爱与雨下: 请勿点击"确认回帖应助" 2012-10-20 07:11:39

本帖内容被屏蔽

4楼2012-10-20 00:13:53

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

查看全部 4 个回答

xiaoyingwv

铁虫 (小有名气)

翻译EPI: 2
应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 215.8
红花: 1
帖子: 67
在线: 23小时
虫号: 1839828
注册: 2012-05-30
专业: 药物化学

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
爱与雨下: 金币+2 2012-10-20 07:10:26
oink: 金币+30, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2012-10-21 15:31:21

将样品的研磨次数增加到六次（PAL-6，PAL-8，PAL-10），在2θ=8.38°处的特征峰强度显著减弱，而其他衍射峰强度

没有明显变化，说明高强度的重复研磨能在一定程度上影响PAL的晶型，降低PAL的有序-无序的结构比例，这是较好吸附

剂的优良性质，下面对MB的吸附试验也证实了PAL的这一优良性质。

在2θ=8.38°处的特征峰强度，PAL-6的峰强度最低，PAL-8的峰强度增加了而PAL-10的峰强度降低了。原因可能如下：

对PAL-6而言，聚集的晶体解离，棒状晶体缩短，进而导致晶体结构在很大程度上遭到破坏；对于PAL-8，由于对样品施

加了更大的压力，晶体结构受到了更大的影响。根据最低能量法则，晶体棒会重新排列，从而导致晶体结构在一定程度上

回复。然而对于PAL-10而言，由于对样品施加了过多的压力，严重影响了其晶体结构，这种影响很难回复。

3.4 研磨程度能影响样品的比表面积，比表面积是吸附剂在吸附重金属离子和燃料时的，一个很重要的物理化学性质。
Liu等人发现吸附剂CTA+REC在除刚果红时，其比表面积对吸附效果影响很大，Chen等人也报道过类似的结论。
因此，研磨次数对PAL比表面的的影响效果已测试，结果见表1.PAL-0的比表面积和Smicro分别为153,28平方米每克。研

磨后比表面积显著增强，PAL-2的比表面积首先增加到229平方米每克，PAL-6的比表面积又降低到184平方米每克.研磨次

数增加到8，比表面积增加到213平方米每克并且保持不变。此外，Sext/比表面积的比例随着研磨次数的增加反而降低，

而且Sext的含量很少改变。
研磨PAL样品，直至PAL-6样品Sext/比表面积的比例一直增加，然而由于比表面积的改变，随着研磨次数的增加Sext/比

表面积的值反而降低，说明研磨次数对Sext有较大影响。

Smicro 和 Smicro/比表面积的值与研磨次数的均符合所得到的比表面积。PAL-2之前Smicro随着研磨次数增加而增加

，到PAL-6会减少，最后又会增加。

PAL的Smicro随研磨后均高于PAL-0，总之，由于Smicro的增加，研磨过的PAL的比较表面都明显比PAL-0的比表面积高。

FESEM图像证实，这是由于研磨后棒状PAL晶体变短，导致微小粒子增多进而导致Smicro增加。

附注：3.5之前的均已翻译过，部分专业词汇可能翻译不是很准确（例如Smicro; Sext ;），仅供参考