24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4576)
>休闲灌水 (475)
>虫友互识 (388)
>导师招生 (339)
>文献求助 (327)
>论文投稿 (186)
>博后之家 (173)
>招聘信息布告栏 (134)
>硕博家园 (65)
>学术会议 (63)
>考博 (56)
>找工作 (43)
>基金申请 (40)
>教师之家 (34)
>育儿交流 (33)
>有机交流 (30)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wwmwwm

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 28 (小学生)
金币: 304.4
帖子: 739
在线: 210.6小时
虫号: 431391

[交流] 三投C -S，中秋闻佳音

从去年开始，先向CS投出了第一篇文章，两个月后，来了消息，
主编云：
I regret to inform you that the reviewers of your manuscript have advised against publication, and I must therefore reject it.
审稿人：
Reviewers' comments:
1. 。。。Correct English is mandatory for publication in CS.
7. 。。。This will entail a complete rewriting of the Discussion.
8. 。。。I would expect to see a much bigger literature on the behaviour of these materials in both 。。。.
其余为小错误。
###################################################
今年，向CS投出了第二篇文章，两个月后，也来了消息，
主编云：
I regret to inform you that the reviewers of your manuscript have advised against publication, and I must therefore reject it.
审稿人 1#：
1，。。。a interesting work, but not acceptable in its present form.
其余小错误若干。
审稿人 2#：
This paper can not be published in any scientific journal,
指出一些最基本的指导意见，比如说去弄清楚最基本的实验程序和基本概念。
编辑还附上了几个语法错误点。
###################################################
四月，向CS投出了第三篇文章，其历程如下：
4.24.submited
4.29.with editor
7.2. required reviews completed
7.11.editor email:
… I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 3 months. Please note that both reviewers recommended rejection. I am nevertheless requesting a revised version of this paper, under the assumption that you will make major improvements to the manuscript according to the comments listed below.

Reviewer #1:
…
Due to the above reasons, the paper may not be recommended for publication in this form.

Reviewer #2:
…the discussion is highly speculative, in part not understandable and not really convincing and the experimental methods are not accurately applied. Therefore, the manuscript has to be rejected.

Me:
做实验，因为学生已毕业，我重新制样，样品寄上海，人去南京，再到钢铁公司，又让同学补实验，花去了两个月。

9.16. 投修改稿，回复写了十五页，其中反驳了第一审稿人的意见一条，补充说明两条，补实验一条；用增补数据反驳第二审稿人意见一条，用参考文献反驳意见一条，用语言反驳一条，补充实验回答一条，补文献回答一条。
按编辑意见修改革十条，自纠小错十数处。
9.24. 主编来信云：
Thank you for the revised version of this paper. Some further minor improvements should be carried out, as detailed in the comments below.
（小错四条）

9.26.再修改投出。Revision submitted to journal
9.29. Submitted to journal
9.30. 主编接受信：
“I am pleased to inform you that your paper… has been accepted for…”

这一天是中秋节，月亮特别圆。我很想表达的是，第三篇论文在第一次修改稿准备过程中，因焦急而显漫长的等待中，小木虫有关帖子给了我很好的指导作用，使得回复比较适当，等待不再枯燥。

祝大家双节快乐！

回复此楼