| 查看: 2970 | 回复: 8 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[交流]
JOSA-B搞定了，有点小高兴。但有一点没看明白。 已有3人参与
|
||
|
On 09/21/2012 the final decision was made on your manuscript with a result of Manuscript Accepted. The manuscript passed through content revision on 09/18/2012. Rereview for your manuscript was completed on 09/17/2012. On 08/27/2012 the final decision was made on your manuscript with a result of Repeat Review. Revisions were submitted on 08/20/2012. Preproduction review for your manuscript was completed on 07/11/2012. On 07/09/2012 the first decision was made on your manuscript with a result of Manuscript Requires Major Revisions. Peer review for your manuscript was completed on 07/09/2012. An editor was assigned to your manuscript on 06/02/2012. Quality check for your manuscript was completed on 06/01/2012. Your manuscript was submitted on 06/01/2012. 以上是全过程，前后折腾3个多月。只是有一点令人不解，有两个审稿人，第一稿回来的时候审稿人A提出了简单修改意见，而审稿人B提出了十分尖锐的批评意见，要求大修。课时交了修改稿之后，编辑考虑了好几天居然只让审稿人A再给审了一下，没再让审稿人B审，这是什么意思呢？按理说应该倒过来啊，A可以不再审，B一定要在看看啊，毕竟他提出的意见最为尖锐。各位说说看法。 [ Last edited by zhy999 on 2012-9-22 at 12:10 ] |
回复此楼
独步青云
新虫 (职业作家)
术中小生
- 应助: 894 (博后)
- 金币: 2993.1
- 散金: 3834
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 3587
- 在线: 241.8小时
- 虫号: 339818
- 注册: 2007-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 中药质量评价
7楼2012-09-22 15:48:49
匿名
用户注销 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 549 (博士)
- 金币: 18649.1
- 散金: 3666
- 红花: 25
- 帖子: 21829
- 在线: 1115.2小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2010-01-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 体育保健学
4楼2012-09-22 10:34:13
6楼2012-09-22 13:30:01
8楼2012-09-22 19:45:12
20