24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

孤狐孤城

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 17 (小学生)
金币: 1939.9
帖子: 1756
在线: 90.4小时
虫号: 1456888
注册: 2011-10-23
专业: 环境工程

[求助] 大家帮忙看看，编辑这样的回复文章还有戏吗？

之前投了CEJ，两个半月后编辑回复如下：
Dear##,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. In fact all reviewers had a lot of critical comments and raised many concerns. One of the reviewer indicated to me the manuscript was poorly written and indicated such manuscripts should not have been submitted. So, in general the manuscript needs a lot of work, both in the technical content and the editorial quality. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. Please give a careful consideration to the criticisms raised. All of them should be taken into account in a revised version of your manuscript. Please send your revised manuscript, together with an itemized letter answering all the comments made and describing all changes made in response, or the reason why no change should be made. Because of the extensive comments made and the criticism raised, your revised manuscript will be sent to all three referees for rereview. If any of the referees declines the revised manuscript or major revisions are requested again, I will have to decline the manuscript since we cannot go back and forth with the reviewers numerous times. So, please try to do a really good job in the revision of the manuscript.

三个评审只有一个说可以考虑修改后接收，编辑还是给了major revision，可是这种情况怎么看都凶多吉少了，请问有类似经验的虫友们我的文章还有戏吗？

回复此楼