24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4025  |  回复: 18
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

smallbug2000

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 哥的论文大修,哥很郁闷,哥不想改了

投了一篇论文到计算机视觉相关的杂志,最近返回结果,三个审稿人,其中两个审稿人意见较少。另一个觉得算法的创新性不够,给了大修,悲剧的是这篇论文之前投到CVPR去,也是这个审稿人审的(CVPR据了我),因为审稿意见基本一样,故可以断定是同一审稿人。最终编辑给了大修,但是我很绝望,因为给大修的审稿人从一开始就不认可我的算法,我想既然我认真修改了,可能还是会被他据。将编辑及大修审稿人意见附后,在此向各位大牛咨询两件事:1)该论文是否值得大修,修后被据的概率多大?2)如果大修,如果对付审稿人这么尖锐的问题。在些感谢,对于好的建议发放金币。
Dear**,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.
The reviewers' comments can be found at the end of this email or can be accessed by following the provided link.



Reviewers' comments:

The paper was reviewed by three experts on the topic. The reviewers agree that the paper discusses an important problem worth pursuing. They, however, also unanimously point out short comings of the paper, most important of which is the lack of thorough theoretical and experimental validation of the claims as well as references to prior work. The paper needs major revision to be considered for publication. If the authors decide to submit a major revision, please make sure to address the points raised by the reviewers.

Reviewer #2: : This paper deals with the problem of visual tracking with irregular object motion. The particle set shift approach based on analytic optimization is proposed to deal with the incorrect state dynamic model. Particles are first sampled by the state dynamic model and they are moved to higher likelihood regions by newton optimization by maximizing likelihoods. The efficacy of the proposed approach is demonstrated via experiments with real sequences.

- Positive points: Practically effective approach
- Negative points: Not novel approach, rather heuristic, not convincing experimental results

: The main problem of this paper is the proposed approach is not novel. The proposed approach is quite similar to [18] except the fact that the proposed approach used newton optimization instead of mean shift.

: The proposed approach is rather heuristic. In the algorithm, particle weights are only proportional to likelihood, and this holds true for SIR particle filter where particles are sampled from state dynamic model. However, since particles are moved to higher likelihoods artificially, the weights determined from likelihoods will no longer correctly represent the true posterior. The proposed approach is rather similar to the particle swarm optimization-based tracking, e.g., "" by X. ** et al in CVPR 2008. Another problem of the proposed approach is that it might result in worse tracking results when there are appearance changes caused by various issues such as pose and lighting changes.

: Since the proposed work is based on particle filter, the optimal importance functions used for visual tracking are also relevant. If we can use the optimal importance function, the irregular motion can be handled at least partially. Thus the following papers should be cited and commented as related work:
-

: The supplementary video result is too limited. Only a result for a single short sequence is not sufficient to support the validity of the proposed approach. Why is there no rotational motion in the results? The paper says that the state is translation, scale, and rotation, but there is no rotational motion in the results in the paper and video.

: There must be cases that all particles are outside the basin of convergence. Since the particle are shifted by local optimization, particles will diverge from the optimal positions and tracking will fail. In the proposed approach, there is no consideration of this possibility.

: The optimization will increase the computational complexity considerably. It is necessary to compare the other algorithms under the same computational time, e.g., proposed framework with 100 particles and standard particle filter with 1000 particles.

My current recommendation is major revision. If the authors want to make the paper accepted in spite of the limited novelty and contribution, I think the followings should be addressed in the revision:
- Additional experiments with object appearance changes like illumination
- Addition of a mechanism to deal with the local optima problems with additional experiments with related videos
- Comparison under the same computational complexity for different tracking algorithms

[ Last edited by smallbug2000 on 2012-9-6 at 09:52 ]
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

文章写作

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nlyang

禁虫 (著名写手)

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
smallbug2000: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2012-09-06 17:27:12
本帖内容被屏蔽

6楼2012-09-06 15:55:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答

carsonwen

铜虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
smallbug2000: 金币+2 2012-09-06 10:35:47
如果不差论文 毕业或评职称的,那就慢慢改吧,挺好的,有专业人士的意见。
当然你也可以折中一点,用他的意见去做一篇新的文章,原来的文章那就再找个地方投了。
2楼2012-09-06 10:30:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

flywithyu

铜虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
smallbug2000: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2012-09-06 14:45:35
smallbug2000: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2012-09-06 17:37:34
smallbug2000: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2012-09-11 19:27:09
smallbug2000: 金币+4, ★★★★★最佳答案 2012-09-13 14:47:15
这个修改意见不算多的,具体就是:
1、增加实验结果以验证你方法的有效性;(这个只要有数据,应该好办)
2、局部最优问题,这个较难回答,一种你找到方法;另外一种就是通过实验来说明;
3、与不同算法的比较。首先找找网上有没有现成的能出结果的代码吧;实在不行只有自己实现;话说实验室如果有做换个方向的话应该是有一定基础吧。
强烈建议:按照专家意见修改,不要回避,最终你会发现有收获的!!
3楼2012-09-06 12:27:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangzhipengj

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

加油 坚持到底才有胜利
4楼2012-09-06 13:05:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 EZ67DG6CvcKL 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-01 05:45 by o3EMxHUAQDtS
[找工作] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 EZ67DG6CvcKL 2026-08-31 3/150 2026-08-31 22:23 by o3EMxHUAQDtS
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-31 14:40 by hahaboy
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +6 gdd2018 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 08:58 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 (EPI+1)(金币+50) +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
信息提示
请填处理意见