小硕我投CEJ,结果大修,但是有一些审稿专家的意见不是很清楚该怎么做,想请各大侠指点一下:
review 2:建议我修改highlights,这个该怎么弄,因为它不是在论文里面的呀。是不是我提交修改稿的时候可以把原来的highlights的那个word删除,重新换一个?
review 3:
(1) This reviewer suggests that the authors should consider a follow-up work on the effect of KH570 film on TiO2 on the particle adhesion (work-of-adhesion).
这里是要我在论文中简单提一下follow-up work呢还是要把补充这些实验呢,看不太懂呀。。。
(2)The text is readable and structure well, but time to time, the toner becomes informal, which is a minor issue. The revised version of the manuscript can benefit from a review and proofread.
这一个我该怎么修改和答复他呢?
(3) ... Literature includes the following works.
(a) Study on the Charge Control Mechanism of Charge Control Agents, Mizuguchi Jin, Hitachi A., Sato Y. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 52(3), 2008-05.
(b) Effects of Nanoparticle Coverage on the Adhesion Properties of Emulsion Aggregation Toner Particles, Huan Zhang; Weiqiang Ding; Cetinkaya Cetin. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 54(2) 2010, 1-7
(c) Effects of Nanoparticle Coating on the Adhesion of Emulsion Aggregation Toner Particles, XIARONG TONG; WEIQIANG DING; CETINKAYA Cetin. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 24(2), 2010, 371-387.
(d) Adhesion Characterization Based on Rolling Resistance of Individual Microspheres on Substrates: Review of Recent Experimental Progress, MURTHY PERL M.D.; CETINKAYA Cetin. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 22(5-6), 2008, 507-528.
我知道这里是要我引用这些文献,可是悲催的是,这些文献下载不到(学校没购买)。在此,顺便求助这4篇文献,希望能够下载到这4篇文献的大侠们传一份给我:1074075383@qq.com 不胜感激啊。。。 |