应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 投稿求助
71/1返回列表
查看: 1047  |  回复: 6
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

liuruiyi324

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 投稿求助

小弟前段在该杂志上投了一篇文章，等了4个月后，专家意见终于来了，具体如下：
    The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some major revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
(There are no comments.)
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
The paper discusses the results of an experimental investigation aimed at determining the microstructure and crrep properties of a nickel-iron base superalloy as a function of different heat treatments. The paper needs to be revised to include comments as provided below:
1. On the abstract, the authors need to give a statement or two on the background of the experiments rather than merely stating that experiments were conducted.
2. In the introduction section, why do the authors compare forging types immediately after discussing the alloy. It is confusing to the reader.
3. In the material and experimental procedures section, please add description on the sample configuration used for SEM and creep testing. No details are mentioned on the sample geometry utilized for the experiments.
4. While discussing the fracture morphologies for the creep tests, please show SEM microstructure of DA creep tested sample for comparison with HST and ST alloy fracture features.
5. On the discussion section, the authors mention that the differences among the heat treatment evaluated is based on the quantity and location of delta phase. What attempt has been made to quantify the delta phase formation in the alloy? Please substantiate with data.
6. On the conclusion, the authors indicate that the fracture surfaces of the ST alloy include trasngranular fractures and intergranular fractures. These features are not revealed on the SEM fractographs. Please clarify.
    小弟刚上传了修改稿，想请教一下这个杂志复审大概要多久啊？修的不好会拒稿么？
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2012-08-01 13:17:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Monash2011

专家顾问 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2012-08-01 16:50:23
liuruiyi324: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2012-08-02 08:30:35
你应该赶紧按要求修改，然后尽快上传回去，如果你想尽快发表的话
赞一下 回复此楼
继续搂金币中，祝大家好运！
2楼2012-08-01 14:24:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

googleuboy

木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
修的不好很有可能悲剧啊
赞一下 回复此楼
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
3楼2012-08-01 16:31:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sesame_oil

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
好好修改吧，希望不小啊，加油
赞一下 回复此楼
不是哥不笑，一笑粉就掉
4楼2012-08-01 16:50:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
审稿意见很好，相当于就一个审稿人
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2012-08-01 22:14:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

尽快回复，应该就收不成问题
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2012-08-01 22:14:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuruiyi324

铜虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by Monash2011 at 2012-08-01 14:24:15
你应该赶紧按要求修改，然后尽快上传回去，如果你想尽快发表的话

前面查点悲剧，导师把邮件转发我的时候，已经超过了编辑规定上传修改稿的时间节电，。。。还好编辑改了日子，延长了一个礼拜。。。才正常上传了修改稿。
这个情况对最终录用有影响么？
赞一下 回复此楼
7楼2012-08-02 08:33:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 liuruiyi324 的主题更新
71/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭