24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 799  |  回复: 4
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

海洋恋人

银虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
爱与雨下: 金币+1 2012-07-26 20:58:20
yingzi1120: 金币+15, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案, 非常感谢 2012-07-28 08:22:40
Interesting the idea is, there are still some problems unknown in this paper:
1. Though it has a certain effect on the thickness and uniformity to pretreat the sample with a, detrimental phase A inevitably appeared which didn't show in the untreated samples. As we know, crack is always existed between phase A and phase B due to the difference of their thermal expansion coefficient. Therefore, please explain where the specific advantage of this method is
2. It is analyzed in this paper that increasing the temperature or extending the time may contribute to the appearance of phase A. This statement seems to contradict with the reported conclusion that increasing the temperature or extending the time get the carbon atom diffuse sufficiently and then generate towards the more stable phase B.  Why is it? Please give the explanation.
我是自然界最伟大的奇迹
2楼2012-07-26 13:05:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yingzi1120 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见