24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 926  |  回复: 3

hdlhq

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 审稿人建议回来了,不是很明白他的意思!

Reviewer #2:
1. Expression results have not been analyzed for statistical significance to determine if the differences observed are meaningful.【是不是要统计差异的显著性?还是需要怎么分析呢?】
2. Just because the authors see alterations in the roots of the transgenic tobacco plants does not mean that GSK1 actually plays a role in the root.  It is very possible that the ectopic expression alters hormone levels in the roots, but that this has no relationship to the role of GSK1.  Therefore the title and many of the conclusions are not inaccurate.
3. Error bars【是误差线吗?】 are not included in the data for Fig. 5 to show the variability.  The paper would be strengthened if the authors could demonstrate why there is an effect on germination and root growth.  But this would still not say specifically what the specific role of GSK1 actually is.
4. Finally there are a number of grammatical issues/problems with the manuscript, including the lack of some basic description of the generation of transgenic plants in the results section.
The Southern blot data come out of the blue and needs some sort of preface.这句话什么意思呢?
Therefore I can not recommend publication of the manuscript at this time.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shshi

木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
Error bars 应该是误差棒吧,orgin画图里面有的
2楼2012-07-24 09:41:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ranchenxin

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
主要意思是这个审稿人觉得你的实验,或者说你对实验数据的分析并不能证明是GSK1在体系中起作用。
3楼2012-07-24 11:04:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

caogaoyi

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
southern blot 应该有限制性内切酶的标注,最好还要有分子量大小的指示
奋斗改变命运,梦想让我们与众不同!
4楼2012-07-25 08:35:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 hdlhq 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +11 eulota 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 14:22 by 火星超人xi
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +4 gdd2018 2026-08-28 9/450 2026-08-28 14:22 by jklily
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+5) +12 晴天加油 2026-08-26 13/650 2026-08-28 11:32 by skyjudy
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +7 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 7/350 2026-08-27 18:14 by 瞬息宇宙
[基金申请] 申请删除本帖 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +3 myrtle 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-27 10:01 by angelyueyi
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +7 process2012 2026-08-23 10/500 2026-08-26 19:23 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +10 董八千 2026-08-26 10/500 2026-08-26 16:30 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +9 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-26 15:40 by semaglutide
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +23 koalala 2026-08-24 26/1300 2026-08-26 14:29 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +6 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 6/300 2026-08-25 19:45 by zfd97
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
信息提示
请填处理意见