24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yxg123

银虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 396.5
帖子: 17
在线: 114.7小时
虫号: 842021
注册: 2009-09-06
性别: GG
专业: 电能储存与节电技术

[交流] IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery被拒，请高手帮忙指点下已有6人参与

文章一审2个多月，今天收到Reject - Do Not Resubmit的通知，请高手帮忙指点下，还有修改再投的意义吗？
We regret to advise you that the Reviewing Committee is unable
to accept the subject paper for publication as a PES Transactions paper even with possible revisions.

Enclosed please find the comments of the reviewers that should
serve to explain the recommendation of the reviewing committee.
I hope you will find the explanations satisfactory. Although we
could not accept this paper, we hope that you will consider
Transactions on Power Delivery for other papers in the future.

We thank you for your continued interest in the Power Engineering Society.

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHORS:
Editor's Comments:

Editor
Editor Comments for Author:

The paper has received in general bad reviews. Much of the criticism has been caused by the problems with the English language. It is recommended to the authors that before they submit papers to the IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery to use professional proofreading services.

Reviewers' Comments:

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
Authors have presented a method to improve the measurement accuracy of mutual inductance transmission line parameters. However, reviewer has not found enough new research work performed by authors to be published in IEEE transactions of Power Delivery.
The authors have compared their method with NPFM method, which is not explained that how it works. Further, authors have not provided enough latest references of the NPFM method.
In the introduction section, authors have mentioned that the TTM method performance is affected by multi-circuit line, but they have not shown the performance of the proposed method in this case.
In the section II, the subsections A and B are not having much significant role in the proposed work.
In the section II, subsection C; authors have explained the proposed algorithm. In that subsection, equations 18 to 22 are not new. They have already been derived in the past. Please refer a paper of - Niranjan Kumar, A. K. Sahani, “Microprocessor Based Measurement of Π-Model Transmission Line Parameters Under Fault Conditions”, IET-UK International Conference on Information and Communication Technology in Electrical Sciences (ICTES 2007), Dr. M.G.R. University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Dec. 20-22, 2007, pp. 389-392.
Hence, reviewer has not found enough new research work done by the authors in this subsection.

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
Authors have presented a method of adaptive single ended sweep measurement which can be used for measuring the mutual inductance transmission line parameters.
(i) There are many grammatical errors in the abstract as well as in the introduction. Further, introduction is written in very poor form. Most importantly, connectivity is missing between each section as well as between each sentence.
(i) The authors have not clarified what their novelty is.

Reviewer: 3
Comments to the Author
This paper presents a method for transmission line mutual inductance parameters estimation. Following the authors, the method considers the shunt capacitive effect on the transmission line model, which is ignored by the ´traditional methods´. The proposed method, following the authors, is based on ´non-linear frequency response analysis of transmission line parameters´. This reviewer has the following comments/questions:
- The theoretical analysis presents the behavior of isolated and three-phase conductors impedance with relation to the frequency. On both analyses, AC and DC resistances and inductances are shown in respect with Frequency. A LGJQ-300 wire is given as example. It is not clear how this frequency selection is automatically done by the method for different wire types. As presented the frequency choice seems to be empirical. An explanation on such could be included on the manuscript;
- Equations (20)-(22) are adequate for single phase systems modeled with lumped parameters. The extended equations for 3 phase systems should be presented in the manuscript ;
- Long Transmission lines should be modeled with frequency dependent distributed parameters at the selected frequency range (300-800Hz). Comments on such approximation should be included in the manuscript;
- By selecting the ´best test frequency´, the method makes some considerations about the resistance and inductance behavior of wires. However the resistance and inductance behavior of the three phase lines are dependent, between others, on geometric and construction parameters. Equation 13 provides such relation. It is not clear how the estimated resistance and inductance values (which equations are not presented), will be used together with the line frequency characteristic curves to provide the mutual inductance parameter. Detail explanation on such should be provided on the manuscript;
- It is not clear on the proposed method, how the estimated values are compensated from the mutual inductance effect. An explanation on such could be included on the manuscript;
- Different geometric configurations and operating conditions will produce different mutual inductance values. A discussion on such, based on test results, could be included on the manuscript;
- No reference for the so called NPFM method is presented. Such reference should be in the manuscript;
- A complete grammatical text review could improve greatly the manuscript readability. Figure 4 text should read inductance instead of resistance;

Reviewer: 4
Comments to the Author
(There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.)

回复此楼