24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1582  |  回复: 4
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yazai

新虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 写的一个综述终于1个多月就给返修了,之前拒了很多次 已有4人参与

由于在另外一个杂志上有一部分有人做过综述,所以编辑在建议里提到了相关的内容,
reviewer1
......, The review is based on references published in the period from 1976-2011, among them were more than 50% of the papers published before 2000. In my opinion, more useful for readers would be to choose a period of the last 5 or 10 years.. The papers still relevant should be only discussed. Generally the paper should be shortened.


The most critical problem is its originality because it is very similar to a review paper published in Journal of Chromatography B (Wenjuan S et al, 2007). It is strange that the authors didn’t mention this reference at all.

reviewer2:The paper intitulated “.........” describes a review.........

The paper is well organized and can be published in ACA after minor revision described below:
大部分是关于细节的修改,
不知道介绍的可能性多大!!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

changh

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
楼主很牛,已经写综述了。
祝福楼主文章早日刊出!
北方
3楼2012-07-04 05:52:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yazai 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见