24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xxwang3330

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 78
散金: 70
红花: 2
帖子: 29
在线: 45.4小时
虫号: 1847318
注册: 2012-06-04
专业: 构造地质学与活动构造

[求助] 评审结果出了，要求moderate revision

请牛虫给看看评语，认真改改，被接收的概率大吗？
Journal manager回复：I can now inform you that the reviewers and editor have evaluated the manuscript "文章题目“. As you will see from the comments below and on 期刊, moderate revision has been requested.

reviewer#1意见：This manuscript reports good quality data for Himalaya. This is an important contribution to the understanding of the early stage of tectonic evolution of the Tibetan plateau. The data is high quality, and the preliminary interpretations of these data by the authors seem to be reasonable. In my view the paper should definitely be published in Lithos with a moderate revision as detailed below.
reviewer#2意见：Thus it would be an important contribution to a better understanding the tectonics of the Tibetan Plateau. The paper is well-organized and uses techniques and methods to produce geochronological data with balanced arguments that are fundamental to understanding of the Early Paleozoic tectonic evolution of Tibet. The data are relatively well separated from the interpretations, and the conclusions are reasoned in good style.
All in all, this is an important and interesting manuscript, which should be acceptable for publication in Lithos after minor revision considering the following one major concern and some specific comments, which mostly in my annotated PDF attached. I appreciate the chance to review this paper, and I hope these comments will be useful for the revision.

回复此楼