24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2305  |  回复: 5
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lzq999lzq

金虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 请教这是一种客气用语还是?

论文投稿Analytica Chimica Acta半年多,今天终于有了结果,是主编亲自审的稿件,今天终于收到最终结果,被拒,其中最后一段如下:

In view of this confusion, I don't think that this work is suitable for publication in ACA in its present form. Although I believe that CE separations of DNA/RNA systems are clearly of real importance, I don't think that readers of a broad-based analytical chemistry journal such as ACA can be expected to be sufficiently familiar with this field to sort this out. Therefore, I must regrettably recommend against publication at this time. If, however, the authors are able to highlight more effectively the most novel and original aspects of this work and communicate this more clearly, I might be willing to re-consider this decision.

不太了解If, however, the authors are ...这句主编想表达的意思,难道可以重新修改后再投?谢谢!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

afred

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lzq999lzq: 金币+2 2012-06-25 17:01:18
‘虽然工作有重点,有价值,但是还是不足以打动读者’。小学的时候语文老师告诉我们说重点是后半句。其实楼主也很清楚这一点,但是有点不甘心。很现实的说,如果可以补充很重要的其他数据,能考虑重投,而且很有希望;倘若不补充不了,建议你换个JOURNAL
3楼2012-06-25 16:34:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lzq999lzq 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见