| 查看: 92 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价1次，作者danmong增加金币 0.5 个 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[资源]
2007-4-28 EST最新文章和摘要
|
|||
|
Evidence of Bias in Air-Water Henry's Law Constants for Semivolatile Organic Compounds Measured by Inert Gas Stripping Chubashini Shunthirasingham, Ying Duan Lei, and Frank Wania* Department of Chemistry, and Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M1C 1A4 Received for review December 13, 2006 Revised manuscript received March 23, 2007 Accepted March 28, 2007 Abstract: Accurate knowledge of the air-water Henry's law constant (H) is crucial for understanding an organic compound's environmental behavior. The inert gas stripping (IGS) method, widely used to measure H of semivolatile organic compounds (SOCs), may yield erroneously high values for compounds with a high water surface adsorption coefficient, KIA, because chemical adsorbed to the bubble surface may be transferred to the head space upon bursting at the top of the stripping column. Experiments with alkanols of variable chain length identified a KIA threshold of approximately 10-3 m, above which IGS is susceptible to this artifact. Most SOCs are predicted to have KIA values well above that threshold. IGS-determined H-values for chemicals belonging to various groups of SOCs were evaluated by comparison with H-values either calculated from reliable vapor pressure and solubility data or derived from data compilations that achieve thermodynamic consistency through optimized adjustment of measured physical-chemical property data. The investigated deviations were found to be generally consistent with what would be expected from a surface adsorption artifact. Namely, the apparent bias in IGS-determined H-values, if it occurs, (1) is positive, (2) increases with increasing size of an SOC, and (3) increases with decreasing temperature. It generally is also of a magnitude predicted using estimated KIA values. However, different studies display different KIA threshold values, beyond which the artifact becomes notable, and some studies appear to succeed in avoiding the artifact altogether. Whereas the use of aerosol traps cannot explain the absence of a surface adsorption artifact, it may be related to higher flow rates used by some investigators. For large compounds or those with more than one functional group, the predicted deviation is too large when compared to observations, suggesting that the estimated KIA values for those compounds are too high. A full quantitative understanding of the artifact requires more accurate predictions of the adsorption of SOCs to the water surface. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
宝龙街道雄鑫地块土壤和地下水污染风险管控与修复第一次阶段性效果评估报告
已经有0人回复
-
项目结题报告中的小试怎么证明，需要给出什么证明材料
已经有0人回复
-
建筑环境与结构工程论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有167人回复
-
【2025焦点】自吸磁力泵，为何亚梅泵业被行业巨头一致选择？
已经有0人回复
-
请教一下使用电感耦合等离子光谱仪
已经有1人回复
-
权威发布！国产五轴、六轴数控走心机哪个品牌口碑品质好售后好，精度高技术强性价比高
已经有0人回复
-
26环境专业申博自荐
已经有1人回复
2楼2007-04-29 08:44:20
3楼2007-04-29 09:24:57