| 查看: 1903 | 回复: 22 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
winter_north铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
Where is the balance point between being low-carbon and the quality of life
|
||
At present, it is beneficial to llive a low-carbon life to the environment. Such as when washing, use less water, when going to a place, take a bus instead of driving a car, or you can go there by bike, or even go there on foot. However, as you live a low-carbon life, the quality of your life will be affected.  When you become more low-carbon, your life becomes less convenient. Take the transportation as an example. Going to a place on foot is nearly the most low-carbon way, but meanwhile it is the most unconvenient way. You have to walk in the natural air, it may be hot, cold or even humid. There may be many dirty particles in the air, you skin may also be bited by insects. Furthermore, much more time is needed compared with bicycling or driving. If you go there by bike, the time needed is much shorter. But you may still meet the unconvenience of rain, cold or hot air, and the insect. It is less low-carbon than walking, because more energy is needed to make a bicycle. If you go there by bus, you can stay in the bus with clean and comfortable air, it is also faster than bicycling and walking. But, the bus can not drive you to your destination, you have to walk. Compared with walking and bicycling, you need more energy, but compared with driving yourself, you need less energy. Driving yourself to the destination may be the most convenient way to go to your destination. It is the fastest, coziest way. You share the space of a car with yourself, you step in the car from the step of your house, and step out the car at the step of your destination house. However, this way is also the most un-low-carbon way of transportation, the gas of the car, the space of the car and the space it occupies on the road is only used by one person. And, much more engery is needed to make a car than a bicycle. Another interesting example may be bathing. Too often bathing consumes more water, but less bathing may make yourself stink.  So, where is the balance point?  This is a question. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
085410 273分调剂
已经有3人回复
-
291分调剂
已经有5人回复
-
计算机22408 281分，求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
305求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
调剂
已经有3人回复
-
316求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
304求调剂（085602，过四级，一志愿985）
已经有27人回复
-
270求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
312求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
272分材料子求调剂
已经有40人回复
lppv
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
无与伦比俱乐部部长
- ESEPI: 42
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.158
- 金币: 9455.2
- 散金: 21883
- 红花: 262
- 沙发: 257
- 帖子: 29946
- 在线: 3646.7小时
- 虫号: 937152
- 注册: 2010-01-05
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 无机合成和制备化学
- 管辖: English Cafe
YOU THINK SO MUCH...
5楼2012-06-06 17:53:28
seagrove
禁虫 (文坛精英)
小盼妞
- ESEPI: 20
- 应助: 113 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 11.811
- 金币: 36350
- 散金: 39603
- 红花: 193
- 沙发: 1550
- 帖子: 37667
- 在线: 1963.3小时
- 虫号: 1239918
- 注册: 2011-03-21
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 化工冶金
- 管辖: 环境
6楼2012-06-06 18:50:20
7楼2012-06-06 19:03:00
★ ★
curton: 金币+2, This is really a question. But in my perspective view, the low carbon life which we advocate is extremely urgent thing. 2012-06-06 22:30:50
curton: 回帖置顶 2012-06-06 22:30:51
curton: 金币+2, This is really a question. But in my perspective view, the low carbon life which we advocate is extremely urgent thing. 2012-06-06 22:30:50
curton: 回帖置顶 2012-06-06 22:30:51
|
I think it is up to you. If you live a lown-carbon life, you may feel very comfortable. And this is the high-qulity life in my opinion. |
8楼2012-06-06 19:44:04
