| 查看: 2086 | 回复: 22 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
winter_north铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
Where is the balance point between being low-carbon and the quality of life
|
||
At present, it is beneficial to llive a low-carbon life to the environment. Such as when washing, use less water, when going to a place, take a bus instead of driving a car, or you can go there by bike, or even go there on foot. However, as you live a low-carbon life, the quality of your life will be affected.  When you become more low-carbon, your life becomes less convenient. Take the transportation as an example. Going to a place on foot is nearly the most low-carbon way, but meanwhile it is the most unconvenient way. You have to walk in the natural air, it may be hot, cold or even humid. There may be many dirty particles in the air, you skin may also be bited by insects. Furthermore, much more time is needed compared with bicycling or driving. If you go there by bike, the time needed is much shorter. But you may still meet the unconvenience of rain, cold or hot air, and the insect. It is less low-carbon than walking, because more energy is needed to make a bicycle. If you go there by bus, you can stay in the bus with clean and comfortable air, it is also faster than bicycling and walking. But, the bus can not drive you to your destination, you have to walk. Compared with walking and bicycling, you need more energy, but compared with driving yourself, you need less energy. Driving yourself to the destination may be the most convenient way to go to your destination. It is the fastest, coziest way. You share the space of a car with yourself, you step in the car from the step of your house, and step out the car at the step of your destination house. However, this way is also the most un-low-carbon way of transportation, the gas of the car, the space of the car and the space it occupies on the road is only used by one person. And, much more engery is needed to make a car than a bicycle. Another interesting example may be bathing. Too often bathing consumes more water, but less bathing may make yourself stink.  So, where is the balance point?  This is a question. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有16人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有45人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有11人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有4人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有8人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有37人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有7人回复
-
filecode
已经有9人回复
-
请教兼职经验
已经有3人回复
-
职称评审，求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊
已经有5人回复
lppv
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
无与伦比俱乐部部长
- ESEPI: 42
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.158
- 金币: 9455.2
- 散金: 21883
- 红花: 262
- 沙发: 257
- 帖子: 29946
- 在线: 3646.7小时
- 虫号: 937152
- 注册: 2010-01-05
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 无机合成和制备化学
- 管辖: English Cafe
YOU THINK SO MUCH...
5楼2012-06-06 17:53:28
seagrove
禁虫 (文坛精英)
小盼妞
- ESEPI: 20
- 应助: 113 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 11.811
- 金币: 36350
- 散金: 39603
- 红花: 193
- 沙发: 1550
- 帖子: 37667
- 在线: 1963.3小时
- 虫号: 1239918
- 注册: 2011-03-21
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 化工冶金
- 管辖: 环境
6楼2012-06-06 18:50:20
7楼2012-06-06 19:03:00
★ ★
curton: 金币+2, This is really a question. But in my perspective view, the low carbon life which we advocate is extremely urgent thing. 2012-06-06 22:30:50
curton: 回帖置顶 2012-06-06 22:30:51
curton: 金币+2, This is really a question. But in my perspective view, the low carbon life which we advocate is extremely urgent thing. 2012-06-06 22:30:50
curton: 回帖置顶 2012-06-06 22:30:51
|
I think it is up to you. If you live a lown-carbon life, you may feel very comfortable. And this is the high-qulity life in my opinion. |
8楼2012-06-06 19:44:04
