24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

melody_tung

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.01
金币: 210.9
散金: 222
红花: 1
帖子: 909
在线: 44.2小时
虫号: 500656
注册: 2008-02-13
性别: MM
专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源

[求助] 求翻译一段话，很重要，大牛们务必帮忙！

请牛人帮忙翻译以下内容，不需要逐字逐句，但希望清晰明了并且意思准确，这关系到我的学位申请问题，谢谢大家了！完成后满意有追赏！

The process of peer-review and publication in the interactive scientific journal Ocean Science (OS) differs from traditional scientific journals. It is a two-stage process involving the scientific discussion forum Ocean Science Discussions (OSD), and it has been designed to use the full potential of the internet to foster scientific discussion and enable rapid publication of scientific papers.

Initial access review by competent editors assures the basic scientific and technical quality for papers published in OSD. Subsequent interactive discussion and public commenting by the referees, authors and other members of the scientific community is expected to enhance quality control for papers published in OS beyond the limits of the traditional closed peer-review. Also in cases where no additional comments from the scientific community are received, a full peer-review process in the traditional sense, but in a more transparent way, is assured before publication of a paper in OS.

The individual steps of the OS process of peer-review, publication and interactive discussion are described below, and complementary illustrations are given in the following Flow Chart .

1.Submission of Original Manuscript and Editor Assignment
An original manuscript is submitted electronically and assigned to a Topic Editor covering the relevant subject areas (for details see Editor Assignment).

2.Access Review
The Topic Editor is asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is within the scope of the journal and whether it meets a basic scientific quality. If necessary, he may ask independent referees of his choice for support. He can suggest technical corrections (typing errors, clarification of figures, etc.) before publication in OSD. Further requests for revision of the scientific contents are not allowed at this stage of the review process but shall be expressed in the interactive discussion following publication in OSD.

3.Technical Corrections
The authors have the opportunity to perform technical corrections, which may be reviewed by the Topic Editor to verify requested corrections and prevent further revisions, which are not permitted at this stage.

4.Publication of Discussion Paper in OSD
After final acceptance the manuscript is typeset by the Copernicus Publications Production Office, proofread by the authors, and published as a discussion paper on the OSD Website. Public accessibility, archiving and citability are guaranteed from this moment on (usually about 2-8 weeks after submission).

5.Open Discussion (8 weeks)
Upon internet publication the paper is opened for public review and discussion, during which interactive comments can be published by designated referees (anonymous or named) and all interested members of the scientific community (named). Normally, every discussion paper shall receive at least two Referee Comments; for more information see Interactive Public Discussion.

6.Final Response
After the open discussion the authors are expected to publish a response to all comments (within 4 weeks, extendable upon request). The editor can also publish additional comments or recommendations. Normally, however, formal editorial recommendations and decisions shall be made only after the authors have had an opportunity to respond to all comments, or if they request editorial advice before responding.

7.Submission of Revised Manuscript
Submission of a revised manuscript is expected only if the authors have satisfactorily addressed all comments, and if the revised manuscript meets the high quality standards of OS (MS Evaluation Criteria). In case of doubt, the authors shall consult the editor if she/he recommends preparation and submission of a revised manuscript or not. Normally the revised manuscript should be submitted no later than 4 to 8 weeks after the end of the open discussion. If more time is required for manuscript revision, the authors can request an extension.

8.Peer-Review Completion
In view of the access peer-review and Interactive Public Discussion, the Topic Editor either directly accepts/rejects the revised manuscript for publication in OS or consults referees in the same way as during the completion of a traditional peer-review process. If necessary, additional revisions may be requested during peer-review completion until a final decision about acceptance/rejection for OS is reached.

9.Publication of Final Revised Paper in OS
In case of acceptance the final revised paper is typeset and proofread. Then it is published on the OS Website with a direct link to the preceding original paper and interactive discussion in OSD. All publications (original paper, interactive comments, final revised paper) are permanently archived and remain accessible to the open public via internet and the final revised paper is also accessible as print copy.

[ Last edited by melody_tung on 2012-6-4 at 16:44 ]

回复此楼