投的是Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C
意见比较多，但没有致命性意见，基本上是要求描述更清楚、图片修改之类；总体意见有几句如下：
In general, in the opinion of the reviewer, the paper is a well-written
paper. The paper is interesting, the work presented has a good level, is
precise, carefully done and the conclusions are quite clear and useful.
The topic is of interest and the argument is plausible. Nevertheless, authors
should complete a better explanation of some aspects of the paper that will
be exposed in the next lines.
看这个总体意见，我觉得应该是中了，但有个疑问，对下面分条的意见，都要逐条做出解释吗？因为有些意见偏离论文的主题，审稿人可能是外行。
另外，论文文字数量超了点，编辑在意见里也提出来了，如果再修改完，字数可能还多，不知道这个是不是个大问题？ |
回复此楼
+2/716
山东高校教师考核超级无底线，员工过不下去啦
+4