| 查看: 10772 | 回复: 39 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
初审意见两个审稿人，一个强调创新性不强，一个要求大修. 该 怎样回复啊？ 谢谢
|
||
|
4月份投稿，一个月回来审稿意见，两个专家意见不一致： Reviewer #1: The authors have applied an adequate strategy and experimental setup for the characterization of the parameters involved. The work has adequate relevance with regard to the methodical approach applied. The experimental design presented here is simple, comprehensible and replicable. The advances of the article are very limited because the experimental approach and observations made as such are well known and adequately established. Therefore, the novelty aspects are diminished. The results show only a marginal advance in the concerned research field. Therefore, I regret that the manuscript is likely to have a low scientific impact. Reviewer #2: It is an interesting paper, although there are certain points that need improvement. ..... 编辑考虑:Based on the advice received, your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. 显然编辑比较好，请教各位虫友，这第一个专家的意见该怎样回复才能比较有说服力？修改好后还会送给第三个专家仲裁么？谢谢各位虫友。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求教各位大神：2026教育部人文社科青年基金项目何时公示呀？
已经有4人回复
-
浙江师范大学是怎么坑我的
已经有6人回复
-
面上有专家说实验设备不是我们单位的
已经有8人回复
-
科研求助
已经有4人回复
-
博士去二本高校当辅导员，如何调整心态？
已经有11人回复
-
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有6人回复
-
闲聊
已经有3人回复
csuflyingfish
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 20 (小学生)
- 金币: 1557.2
- 散金: 41
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1881
- 在线: 146.2小时
- 虫号: 425525
- 注册: 2007-07-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学分析
40楼2014-09-13 10:43:55
2楼2012-05-10 07:52:07
啸天犬
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 2171 (讲师)
- 金币: 9715.1
- 红花: 45
- 帖子: 3962
- 在线: 302.2小时
- 虫号: 1362468
- 注册: 2011-08-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 水文地质学(含地热地质学)
3楼2012-05-10 07:53:55
marshalsanetti
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3352.1
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 220
- 在线: 122.5小时
- 虫号: 225969
- 注册: 2006-03-23
- 专业: 质谱分析
4楼2012-05-10 08:15:06