| 查看: 10971 | 回复: 39 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
初审意见两个审稿人，一个强调创新性不强，一个要求大修. 该 怎样回复啊？ 谢谢
|
||
|
4月份投稿，一个月回来审稿意见，两个专家意见不一致： Reviewer #1: The authors have applied an adequate strategy and experimental setup for the characterization of the parameters involved. The work has adequate relevance with regard to the methodical approach applied. The experimental design presented here is simple, comprehensible and replicable. The advances of the article are very limited because the experimental approach and observations made as such are well known and adequately established. Therefore, the novelty aspects are diminished. The results show only a marginal advance in the concerned research field. Therefore, I regret that the manuscript is likely to have a low scientific impact. Reviewer #2: It is an interesting paper, although there are certain points that need improvement. ..... 编辑考虑:Based on the advice received, your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. 显然编辑比较好，请教各位虫友，这第一个专家的意见该怎样回复才能比较有说服力？修改好后还会送给第三个专家仲裁么？谢谢各位虫友。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
请问社科规划办官网上的“项目查询模块”与“项目申报模块”的账号密码一样吗？
已经有3人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有9人回复
-
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有15人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有5人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有12人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有15人回复
21楼2012-05-10 15:23:10
2楼2012-05-10 07:52:07
啸天犬
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 2171 (讲师)
- 金币: 9715.1
- 红花: 45
- 帖子: 3962
- 在线: 302.2小时
- 虫号: 1362468
- 注册: 2011-08-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 水文地质学(含地热地质学)
3楼2012-05-10 07:53:55
marshalsanetti
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3352.1
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 220
- 在线: 122.5小时
- 虫号: 225969
- 注册: 2006-03-23
- 专业: 质谱分析
4楼2012-05-10 08:15:06