24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1644  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zbma

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 如何恢复这个专家意见

专家意见如下:请教各位虫友如何恢复这个意见,因为我的文章内容和他给的参考对比的文献方法有很大的差别。不知道他让我对比是什么意思。
1)The authors demonstrated a fabrication method on silicon substrate that can generate multilevel roughness, then hydrophobic properties were studies. The work is solid and the topic is interesting, but the method itself is not novel and significant enough. The authors could compare with many other publications in JMM, for example, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp. 035024 (2008), and clearly specify the originality and significance of this proposed method.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
clearly specify the originality and significance of this proposed method

要你说清楚相比之下,你的方法的新意及重要性在什么地方。
6楼2012-05-02 12:35:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zbma 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见