| 查看: 1250 | 回复: 4 | ||
xujuliang铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
thin solid films 审稿回复求助
|
|
大牛们，小弟投了一篇Thin Solid Films，已经修改两次了，最近刚刚又回来让修改。原文中我用EIS测试了MnO2的性能，并进行了拟合。在拟合过程中选用了一个等效电路，而且拟合的结果非常符合实际测量的结果。审稿人的问题是：How was the equivalent circuit obtained? 我把这两次的问答都贴上来，想求教一下大牛们改怎么回答。 My First response: The equivalent circuit was obtained according to the physical structure of the whole electrode. Besides, the fitted line was well consisted with the real data obtained by experiments. So we chose this equivalent circuit. Reviewer‘s assessment: I guess this is okay, but the authors did not really answer my question. I realize they fit to the circuit in Figure 15; I was looking for justification. My Second response: The equivalent circuit was obtained from ref. 40 (C.J. Xu, H.D. Du, B.H. Li, F.Y. Kang, Y.Q. Zeng, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009) A73.). The reference was added in the manuscript. (Page 11, line 21) Reviewer’s assessment: It is good to add the reference, but there is still no justification for the circuit. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有14人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有7人回复
-
哪位高人中了，把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看，让我长长见识
已经有7人回复
-
面上意见出来了
已经有23人回复
-
能否申诉？
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Journal of Solid State Chemistry 审稿意见求助？
已经有4人回复
- Thin solid films审稿人数目和审稿周期？
已经有10人回复
- 请问谁能帮我解释块状氧化铟为什么不能在室温下发射荧光？
已经有7人回复
- 求助：有关薄膜类外文期刊杂志
已经有5人回复
- 【求助】Solid State Sciences 杂志审稿速度？？
已经有7人回复
- 求助大家关于ZnO掺Al透明导电薄膜研究可以投的期刊
已经有12人回复
- Thin Solid Films 审稿意见
已经有5人回复
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
My First response: The equivalent circuit was obtained according to the physical structure of the whole electrode. Besides, the fitted line was well consisted with the real data obtained by experiments. So we chose this equivalent circuit. Reviewer‘s assessment: I guess this is okay, but the authors did not really answer my question. I realize they fit to the circuit in Figure 15; I was looking for justification. 这个是要求你从原理上阐述，为什么实验和模型相符合 My Second response: The equivalent circuit was obtained from ref. 40 (C.J. Xu, H.D. Du, B.H. Li, F.Y. Kang, Y.Q. Zeng, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009) A73.). The reference was added in the manuscript. (Page 11, line 21) Reviewer’s assessment: It is good to add the reference, but there is still no justification for the circuit. 你把equivalent circuit 原理详细说明下 |
2楼2012-03-28 09:31:41
Love_Matrix
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 13 (小学生)
- 金币: 2784
- 帖子: 984
- 在线: 344.1小时
- 虫号: 1684472
- 注册: 2012-03-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粉末冶金与粉体工程
所以说不能只参考就行，拟合是有随意性的，残差只是相对的，拟合的再好不一定模型就正确， 3楼2012-04-03 20:39:51
qiqiqiqi
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
小木虫发型设计师
- 应助: 1053 (博后)
- 贵宾: 0.422
- 金币: 12494.5
- 散金: 3982
- 红花: 56
- 沙发: 56
- 帖子: 7824
- 在线: 432.1小时
- 虫号: 831048
- 注册: 2009-08-20
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 半导体材料
4楼2012-04-05 22:02:01
xujuliang
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: -7.7
- 散金: 1
- 帖子: 101
- 在线: 56.2小时
- 虫号: 832765
- 注册: 2009-08-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料的磨损与磨蚀
5楼2012-04-06 11:09:06
5
