| ²é¿´: 954 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||
xujuliangͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
thin solid films Éó¸å»Ø¸´ÇóÖú
|
|
´óÅ£ÃÇ£¬Ð¡µÜͶÁËһƪThin Solid Films£¬ÒѾÐÞ¸ÄÁ½´ÎÁË£¬×î½ü¸Õ¸ÕÓÖ»ØÀ´ÈÃÐ޸ġ£ÔÎÄÖÐÎÒÓÃEIS²âÊÔÁËMnO2µÄÐÔÄÜ£¬²¢½øÐÐÁËÄâºÏ¡£ÔÚÄâºÏ¹ý³ÌÖÐÑ¡ÓÃÁËÒ»¸öµÈЧµç·£¬¶øÇÒÄâºÏµÄ½á¹û·Ç³£·ûºÏʵ¼Ê²âÁ¿µÄ½á¹û¡£Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌâÊÇ£ºHow was the equivalent circuit obtained? ÎÒ°ÑÕâÁ½´ÎµÄÎÊ´ð¶¼ÌùÉÏÀ´£¬ÏëÇó½ÌһϴóÅ£ÃǸÄÔõô»Ø´ð¡£ My First response: The equivalent circuit was obtained according to the physical structure of the whole electrode. Besides, the fitted line was well consisted with the real data obtained by experiments. So we chose this equivalent circuit. Reviewer¡®s assessment: I guess this is okay, but the authors did not really answer my question. I realize they fit to the circuit in Figure 15; I was looking for justification. My Second response: The equivalent circuit was obtained from ref. 40 (C.J. Xu, H.D. Du, B.H. Li, F.Y. Kang, Y.Q. Zeng, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009) A73.). The reference was added in the manuscript. (Page 11, line 21) Reviewer¡¯s assessment: It is good to add the reference, but there is still no justification for the circuit. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ҩѧ105500ר˶289·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
0703×Ü·Ö331Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©2£¬²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
273Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¨Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Ê¦´ó£©
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»¦9£¬326·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
080500Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Journal of Solid State Chemistry Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÇóÖú£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Thin solid filmsÉó¸åÈËÊýÄ¿ºÍÉó¸åÖÜÆÚ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÇëÎÊËÄܰïÎÒ½âÊÍ¿é×´Ñõ»¯î÷Ϊʲô²»ÄÜÔÚÊÒÎÂÏ·¢ÉäÓ«¹â£¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú£ºÓйر¡Ä¤ÀàÍâÎÄÆÚ¿¯ÔÓÖ¾
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Solid State Sciences ÔÓÖ¾Éó¸åËÙ¶È£¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú´ó¼Ò¹ØÓÚZnO²ôAl͸Ã÷µ¼µç±¡Ä¤Ñо¿¿ÉÒÔͶµÄÆÚ¿¯
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Thin Solid Films Éó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
hls85915
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
¿ÆÑй¤¾ß°æ¡ª¡ªÉ³Ä®Ö®ºú
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 4716 (¸±½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 5.06
- ½ð±Ò: 58820
- É¢½ð: 11484
- ºì»¨: 203
- ɳ·¢: 56
- Ìû×Ó: 32316
- ÔÚÏß: 1824Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1080748
- ×¢²á: 2010-08-24
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ±¬Õ¨Óë³å»÷¶¯Á¦Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑй¤¾ß
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
|
My First response: The equivalent circuit was obtained according to the physical structure of the whole electrode. Besides, the fitted line was well consisted with the real data obtained by experiments. So we chose this equivalent circuit. Reviewer¡®s assessment: I guess this is okay, but the authors did not really answer my question. I realize they fit to the circuit in Figure 15; I was looking for justification. Õâ¸öÊÇÒªÇóÄã´ÓÔÀíÉϲûÊö£¬ÎªÊ²Ã´ÊµÑéºÍÄ£ÐÍÏà·ûºÏ My Second response: The equivalent circuit was obtained from ref. 40 (C.J. Xu, H.D. Du, B.H. Li, F.Y. Kang, Y.Q. Zeng, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009) A73.). The reference was added in the manuscript. (Page 11, line 21) Reviewer¡¯s assessment: It is good to add the reference, but there is still no justification for the circuit. Äã°Ñequivalent circuit ÔÀíÏêϸ˵Ã÷Ï |

2Â¥2012-03-28 09:31:41
Love_Matrix
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 13 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 4061.5
- Ìû×Ó: 984
- ÔÚÏß: 342.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1684472
- ×¢²á: 2012-03-12
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ·Ûĩұ½ðÓë·ÛÌ幤³Ì
3Â¥2012-04-03 20:39:51
qiqiqiqi
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
Сľ³æ·¢ÐÍÉè¼ÆÊ¦
- Ó¦Öú: 1053 (²©ºó)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.422
- ½ð±Ò: 12494.5
- É¢½ð: 3982
- ºì»¨: 56
- ɳ·¢: 56
- Ìû×Ó: 7824
- ÔÚÏß: 432.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 831048
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-20
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå²ÄÁÏ

4Â¥2012-04-05 22:02:01
xujuliang
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: -7.7
- É¢½ð: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 101
- ÔÚÏß: 56.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 832765
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô²ÄÁϵÄÄ¥ËðÓëĥʴ
5Â¥2012-04-06 11:09:06














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ËùÒÔ˵²»ÄÜÖ»²Î¿¼¾ÍÐУ¬ÄâºÏÊÇÓÐËæÒâÐԵģ¬²Ð²îÖ»ÊÇÏà¶ÔµÄ£¬ÄâºÏµÄÔٺò»Ò»¶¨Ä£Ð;ÍÕýÈ·£¬