| 查看: 2560 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
guoliang_1204无虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
journal of membrane science 修改稿求助
|
||
|
小弟去年10月投了一篇文章到JMS,这个杂志审稿周期为1个月。结果呢一个编辑审稿1个月后告诉我要我加一个数据,然后feel free to resubmit the paper. 11月底的时候我就submit了文章,12月8号under review,大概1月26号的时候编辑说要我再继续推荐3个审稿人,我又推荐了3个,大概3月16号收到来信,如下: I have made numerous attempts to obtain a another review from a second referee, including sending multiple reminder letters. Unfortunately, I have only one review. To prevent undue delay for you, I have decided to proceed based on one review. A Reviewers has now commented on your paper and comments are appended below. You will see that the referee is advising that you revise your manuscript. The referee comments that the manuscript could reasonably be shortened, and that the advantages of your system should be framed with respect to prior literature. Some of the SEMs could also be included in the Supplementary Information. Please consider the comments and suggestions carefully and incorporate the appropriate changes into your revised manuscript. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. In order to determine the extent of your revision and facilitate the re-review process should it be necessary, please provide a detailed point-by-point response and a clear indication of where changes were made to the original manuscript, by indicating all changes with colored text. To submit a revision, go to http://ees.elsevier.com/memsci/ and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there. When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. For guidelines on how to submit your revised manuscript please go the following address: http://support.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/91 You are expected to return your Revision within 3 months. 这个是大修还是小修呢?我查到的状态只有REVISE,我修改好后被拒的概率高么,还会外审么?谢谢大家了,以前没遇到这个情况 |
» 猜你喜欢
请问有评职称,把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有6人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有6人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊,第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有7人回复
真诚求助:手里的省社科项目结项要求主持人一篇中文核心,有什么渠道能发核心吗
已经有8人回复
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件
已经有5人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有4人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
AI论文写作工具:是科研加速器还是学术作弊器?
已经有3人回复
zhaoghit
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 31 (小学生)
- 金币: 870.3
- 散金: 866
- 帖子: 604
- 在线: 204.3小时
- 虫号: 741084
- 注册: 2009-04-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境微生物学
|
恕我直言。从编辑的来信我可以肯定的说,楼主要有心理准备。 (1)首先你这篇稿件的内容不是很符合期刊的范畴,否则审稿人不会那么难找,或者你做的东西涉及的人比较少。 (2)就那一位审稿人的意见看上去貌似没什么,其实我看比大修还难弄,觉得你的内容冗繁,要求你做合理的精简。这个很难point to point修改啊。其实编辑完全可以以这一条拒掉。可是他给了你修改的机会,但是你能否过了那位不太好对付的审稿人这关不容易。其余两个就是小问题了。 (3)庆幸的是我觉得审稿人不是中国的审稿人,从语言上判断还是很随和和谦虚的。你一定要找你这方面厉害些的大牛帮助,把一下关,优化下你的稿子,注意语言等格式其他小问题不要出问题了,在回复信里面好好阐述,并很诚恳的对待审稿人的问题,你还是有机会的,我想编辑主要也就是看他的意见了,如果他再这种态度那只有一个结果了。 祝楼主好运! |

14楼2012-03-24 07:28:53
sesame_oil
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4518 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 2.947
- 金币: 35328.4
- 散金: 385
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 18585
- 在线: 536.5小时
- 虫号: 1188734
- 注册: 2011-01-12
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
- 管辖: 论文投稿

2楼2012-03-21 10:28:36
guoliang_1204
无虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: -53.6
- 散金: 200
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 479
- 在线: 425.2小时
- 虫号: 475699
- 注册: 2007-12-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子合成化学
3楼2012-03-21 10:29:14
frankfh
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
- 应助: 41 (小学生)
- 金币: 121516
- 散金: 172
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 92914
- 在线: 2633.2小时
- 虫号: 1686013
- 注册: 2012-03-12
- 专业: 食品科学基础
4楼2012-03-21 10:31:06













回复此楼