| ²é¿´: 177 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
jerlinlongÌú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÇëÎÊÓÐËÔÚChemistry-A European journal ·¢¹ýÎÄÕ£¿
|
||
|
ǰ¼¸Ìì¸ÕÊÕµ½Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Ò»¸ö½¨ÒéСÐ޸ģ¬Ò»¸ö½¨Òé´óÐ޸ġ£¿ÉÊDZ༵ÄÒâ¼ûÈÃÎÒºÜÓôÃÆ£¬Ãþ²»×ÅÍ·ÄÔѽ£¬ÓÐÄÇλ´ó¸çÔÚÕâ¸öÔÓÖ¾ÉÏ·¢¹ýÎÄÕ£¿£¬Çë°ïÎÒ¿´Ò»Ï±à¼ËµµÄÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿ Dear Dr.*** Thank you for your letter and the above-mentioned manuscript received on 13.02.2007. We read this with interest and asked two referees foe their opinions. We agree with the comments made by one of referees that although your findings are novel they do not reperesent a sufficient basis for publication of a full paper at the present time. If, on the other hand, you have in the meantime obtained new results that are pertinent to the referees' comments, there would, in principle, be no obstacle to reassessing an appropriately supplemented manuscript. I hope that you will understand our decision on this matter. Sincerely yours. Dr.***** editor [ Last edited by daiqiguang on 2007-5-11 at 08:54 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
¼ªÁÖ¹¤³Ì¼¼Êõʦ·¶Ñ§Ôº ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤ £¨0856£© ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¿ÎÌâ×é(»¯Ñ§¡¢»¯¹¤¡¢»·¾³¡¢ÄÜÔ´¡¢²ÄÁÏÏà¹Ø·½Ïò)»¶ÓÄãµÄ¼ÓÈë
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì¼°¹¤Òµ»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ223È˻ظ´
¹ú¼Ò´óÈ˲ſÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤Àà2026Äêµ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¹ú¼Ò´óÈ˲ſÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤Àà2026Äêµ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Ìì½ò¿Æ¼¼´óѧ-£¨ÔºÊ¿ÍŶӣ©ÏȽøÏËάÓëÖ½»ù¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏÍÅ¶Ó ÕÐÊÕ2026˶ʿµ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¼ªÁÖ¹¤³Ì¼¼Êõʦ·¶Ñ§Ôº ½»²æÑ§¿ÆÑо¿Ôº£¨08/07£© ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¹ú¼Ò´óÈ˲ſÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤Àà2026Äêµ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤-²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á3Ãû
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¹óÖÝ´óѧ2026Äê˶ʿÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉúµ÷¼Áȱ¶îÐÅÏ¢
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ºÓÄÏÀí¹¤´óѧ»¯Ñ§»¯¹¤Ñ§ÔºÕÐÊÕ˶ʿµ÷¼ÁÉú2Ãû
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
cosmicking
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 14 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 5492.3
- É¢½ð: 124
- Ìû×Ó: 712
- ÔÚÏß: 425.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 230449
- ×¢²á: 2006-03-26
- רҵ: ´ß»¯»¯Ñ§
2Â¥2007-03-13 20:26:39
chunjli
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.1
- ½ð±Ò: 1017.1
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 307
- ÔÚÏß: 25.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 280880
- ×¢²á: 2006-09-20
- רҵ: ´ß»¯»¯Ñ§

3Â¥2007-03-15 18:20:13














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥