[交流] 读博期间第二篇文章同意接收

Editorially approved for publication 投的PRA。本人做原子光谱，比较老的一个方向。这篇实验，投出去不到一周审稿意见就回来了，the paper would be more appropriate for exposition in a narrowly-targeted and specialized journal instead of PRA。发现基本没戏了。然后和老板商量试着argue了一下，没想到结果不错。这次感觉挺幸运的，碰到了一个不错的审稿人。并且回复也很快。PRA算是我们方向的主流期刊，虽然不是很好，但我们这个过时的方向还能发，知足了，求祝贺。总结下经验，觉得回信argue时要态度谦虚，先肯定referee的建议，然后调理清晰的阐述自己的改进，还有就是如果有机会还是要argue的，不要怕麻烦。希望这些能帮到虫虫。
24Feb12       Editorially approved for publication
24Feb12       Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
21Feb12       Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
09Feb12 20Feb12 Ed. decision and/or ref. comments to author; response rcvd
15Feb12       Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
      15Feb12 Communication (miscellaneous) received from author
14Feb12       Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
      14Feb12 Communication (miscellaneous) received from author
08Feb12 09Feb12 Review request to referee; report received
08Feb12       Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
24Jan12 08Feb12 Ed. decision and/or ref. comments to author; response rcvd
19Jan12 23Jan12 Review request to referee; report received
20Jan12       Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
20Jan12       Right to publish signature received
19Jan12       Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
18Jan12       Acknowledgment sent to author
18Jan12       Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author

回复此楼