24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3805)
>虫友互识 (637)
>文献求助 (223)
>休闲灌水 (218)
>导师招生 (209)
>考博 (130)
>论文投稿 (122)
>博后之家 (92)
>硕博家园 (82)
>招聘信息布告栏 (72)
>论文道贺祈福 (68)
>基金申请 (60)
>教师之家 (50)
>考研 (48)
>找工作 (45)
>公派出国 (21)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

tjufyn

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 61.3
帖子: 304
在线: 61.5小时
虫号: 664326

[交流] 投稿crystal growth & design返回的审稿意见

各位虫友：
本人最近投了篇crystal growth & design，刚刚返回审稿意见，如下：
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Publish after minor revision.

Comments:
- equation numbers 1 to 5 are missing
- page 7 line 21 it is not "NAIR" but "Rodriguez-Hornedo"
- the sentece in front of eqation 4, 5, 7, 8, 10 an 11 should end with a ":"

Additional Questions:
Originality: Good

Technical Quality: Fair

Clarity of Presentation: Good

Importance to Field: Good

Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Publish after minor revision.

Comments:
Overall this paper is easily followed, and develops the arguments in a logical way. However this referee feels that the theory of the approach would benefit from being in a separate section with three parts solubility, complexation, XXX, then application to XXX data, all of which linked to the appendix. This would then allow the result session to be more easily read by a more general reader ship. With regard the IR what step were taken to deconvolute overlapping bands as the level of broading would be high.
If these two issues are dealt with then in this referee’s view this paper would add to the previous published work in this area, by highlighting the issue of using XXXXXXX.

Additional Questions:
Originality: Good

Technical Quality: Fair

Clarity of Presentation: Fair

Importance to Field: Good
请问这样小修被接受的希望大小怎样？另外小修后的修改稿是返回审稿人那里再审还是直接编辑看看就行了？十分感谢大家！

回复此楼